The microscopic details of how a solution responds to changes in a
solute are now becoming experimentally
accessible at the kinds of times that should allow us to follow even
the earliest events in solvation. For time
scales this short there is a genuine chance that one can identify
actual elementary events in the solvation
process, meaning that one can begin to think about explicit
solvation mechanismsthe specific molecular
motions that comprise the crucial steps in the process. Most of
the current theories of solvation dynamics,
however, try to resolve this early-time dynamics by looking at finer
and finer details of the dielectric response
of the bulk solvent, an approach which not only seems to be starting
from the opposite extreme of the behavior
one is trying to understand, but which erects an artificial conceptual
barrier between the solvation processes
of polar and nonpolar liquids. We suggest that, at least at the
times of interest for questions of solvation
mechanism, the distinction between polar and nonpolar solvents is
superficial. The ultrafast dynamics of
both kinds of solvents are more naturally regarded in terms of their
instantaneous normal modeswhich can
be further dissected into contributions from such mechanistic elements
as solvent libration and solvent
translation, and even into contributions from individual solvent shells
surrounding the solute, if so desired.
We show how, from the perspective of this kind of analysis, a
simple scaling argument makes it clear why
solvent libration is usually, but not always, the most efficient route
to solvationand why the important
distinctions are not between the different families of solvents, but
between the differing symmetries of the
various solute−solvent interactions that one can choose to monitor
experimentally. We illustrate these ideas
by performing an instantaneous-normal-mode analysis of the manifestly
nonpolar situation of I2 dissolved in
liquid CO2, an example deliberately chosen to contrast with
our previous study of dipolar solvation in
CH3CN.
In accordance with the predictions of the simple scaling argument,
the primary solvation mechanism shifts
from libration to center-of-mass translation as the solute−solvent
interaction being monitored is changed
from being multipolar in character (dipolar or quadrupolar) to
something more symmetric. We find, moreover,
that the range of the solute−solvent interaction is of no more than
secondary importance in understanding
the solvation mechanism: Coulombic (1/r) potentials behave
little differently than dispersion (1/r
6)
potentials
in their libration/translation preferences, and both exhibit a prompt
solvation process dominated by the first
solvation shell. Much the same kind of analysis can be applied to
the question of whether solute motion is
an important part of solvation: although unfreezing the solute will
always allow for faster solvent response,
we show that the extent of the effect can be quantitatively predicted
by comparing the solute's mass and
moment of inertia with that of the sol...