2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instantaneous record of the geomagnetic field direction of various facies from pyroclastic flow deposits: Tests for consistency in paleomagnetic directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aerial volcanic breccia cools down faster than lava flows and might begin to acquire the TRM before the deposition of the unit ceases (Porreca et al 2006). Our interpretation for F1 unit differs from the aerial deposits, since aerial welded tuff deposits provide clustered paleomagnetic data (Uno et al 2014). It is difficult to detect any possible tilting with F1 unit, but it is considered unlikely since F2 and F3…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Data Are "Untilted"mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aerial volcanic breccia cools down faster than lava flows and might begin to acquire the TRM before the deposition of the unit ceases (Porreca et al 2006). Our interpretation for F1 unit differs from the aerial deposits, since aerial welded tuff deposits provide clustered paleomagnetic data (Uno et al 2014). It is difficult to detect any possible tilting with F1 unit, but it is considered unlikely since F2 and F3…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Data Are "Untilted"mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, paleomagnetic data are used to calculate temperatures of emplacement (Porreca et al 2006). Recently, it has been suggested that densely welded pyroclastic deposits record accurately the ambient geomagnetic field direction at the time of emplacement; on the contrary, non-welded pyroclastic deposits show large confidence limits or deviations from their expected directions due to modification of remanence direction introduced from random rotations of remanence-carrying material during syn-or postdepositional stages (Uno et al 2014).…”
Section: And References Therein) As An Example Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, glassy lithologies such as vitrophyre tend often to have a shallower direction than the lithoidal zone ( Figure 2). Mechanisms proposed to account for discrepant paleomagnetic directions in ignimbrites elsewhere have included sub-blocking-temperature grain rotation [Geissman, 1980;Rosenbaum, 1986;Uno et al, 2014], chemical remagnetization during devitrification [Reynolds, 1977], secular variation during Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1002/2014JB011868 prolonged cooling [Wells and Hillhouse, 1989], and large magnetic anisotropy [Gattacceca and Rochette, 2002]. Most of these ignimbrites are significantly less-intensely welded than Snake River (SR)-type ignimbrites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%