1982
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instigative aggression as a function of past experience and target characteristics.

Abstract: Third-party-instigated aggression was examined by manipulating the provocativeness of the same or a new target in Part 2 of a task. Effects of previous experience with aggression (i.e., interacting with partners supportive of or disapproving of aggression in Part 1) were also examined. Although the provocativeness of the target accounted for the most variance in the amount of aggression expressed, when the target in Part 2 was new, prior experience influenced aggression. Results are discussed in terms of and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter finding suggests that high levels of injustice within an organization may trigger a mounting spiral of aggression and counter-aggression that results in a situation where few, if any, organization members escape unscathed. Rather, as is often the case, aggression elicits aggression, so that the number of persons involved and the range of tactics employed increases over time [White and Gruber, 1982]. The existence of such a pattern is consistent with the findings of a growing body of evidence suggesting that perceptions of having been treated unfairly play an important role in the occurrence of disruptive, antisocial behaviors in workplaces [e.g., Giacalone and Greenberg, 1997;Greenberg, 1990Greenberg, , 1993bGreenberg and Alge,1998;Williams, 1994].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter finding suggests that high levels of injustice within an organization may trigger a mounting spiral of aggression and counter-aggression that results in a situation where few, if any, organization members escape unscathed. Rather, as is often the case, aggression elicits aggression, so that the number of persons involved and the range of tactics employed increases over time [White and Gruber, 1982]. The existence of such a pattern is consistent with the findings of a growing body of evidence suggesting that perceptions of having been treated unfairly play an important role in the occurrence of disruptive, antisocial behaviors in workplaces [e.g., Giacalone and Greenberg, 1997;Greenberg, 1990Greenberg, , 1993bGreenberg and Alge,1998;Williams, 1994].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding situational factors, the effect of provocation or frustration offers an important co‐etiological variable of intoxicated aggression (Ito et al., 1994). Moreover, the contribution of third party (Borden & Taylor, 1973; Luckenbill, 1977; Pernanen, 1991; Taylor & Gammon, 1976; Tedeschi & Felson, 1994; White & Gruber, 1982) and of the victim has to be underlined. In many cases indeed, the intoxication of the victim is a causal or an aggravating factor of violent interactions (Abbey, McAuslan, & Ross, 1998; Goldstein, 1985, Virkkunen, 1974).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%