2014
DOI: 10.1057/9781137374288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Advancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Who should be included as fundraisers, how many there are, and how they achieve success remain a mostly unexplored mystery for the profession and those who depend on it. This reflects a scholarly and practical context in which attention most often focuses on donor behaviors and motivations (Breeze, 2017;Proper & Caboni, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Who should be included as fundraisers, how many there are, and how they achieve success remain a mostly unexplored mystery for the profession and those who depend on it. This reflects a scholarly and practical context in which attention most often focuses on donor behaviors and motivations (Breeze, 2017;Proper & Caboni, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional research about engaging non-traditional donors such as women and multicultural alumni is needed (Drezner, 2009;Proper & Caboni, 2014). The following paragraphs describe some of the primary motivations for philanthropic support by alumni.…”
Section: Motivations For Philanthropic Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there is even less literature focused on these topics. In the higher education and ICA philanthropic literature that is currently available, the studies of motivations and annual fund research are robust (Proper & Caboni, 2014). However, the research on ICA giving has failed to create much generalizable knowledge because many studies examine contributions to a single institution for a single year using only a quantitative methodology, usually, focusing on an annual fund (McEvoy, 2002;Meer & Rosen, 2009;O'Neil & Schenke, 2006;Stinson & Howard, 2010).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the research on ICA giving has failed to create much generalizable knowledge because many studies examine contributions to a single institution for a single year using only a quantitative methodology, usually, focusing on an annual fund (McEvoy, 2002;Meer & Rosen, 2009;O'Neil & Schenke, 2006;Stinson & Howard, 2010). This type of research creates interesting quantitative case studies, but it lacks utility for most practitioners other than those who happen to work at the institution where the case study took place (Proper & Caboni, 2014). Moreover, annual funds only generate a small portion of most ICA fundraising revenue; the majority of the Division I ICA fundraising revenue comes from major gifts 1 and planned giving, 90 percent of which are bequests (Hixson, 2012;Johnson, 2010).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation