Power Shifts and Global Governance 2010
DOI: 10.7135/upo9781843318842.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional and Policy Implications of International Public Goods: The Case of Global Commons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most importantly, this design must be specifically consistent with the nature of the public goods now being transacted in international DA. In the current international geo-political setting, and given the nature of threats and challenges to the international order and welfare, there is a premium on international public goods, which compete with national public goods in the international assistance marketplace (Pinto & De Oliveira, 2011). 3 Some observers, however, might argue that the increased focus on critical global public goods may displace the focus on lagging countries which attach a higher priority to their national public goods, hence creating a dilemma for DA which is increasingly concerned with the former.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, this design must be specifically consistent with the nature of the public goods now being transacted in international DA. In the current international geo-political setting, and given the nature of threats and challenges to the international order and welfare, there is a premium on international public goods, which compete with national public goods in the international assistance marketplace (Pinto & De Oliveira, 2011). 3 Some observers, however, might argue that the increased focus on critical global public goods may displace the focus on lagging countries which attach a higher priority to their national public goods, hence creating a dilemma for DA which is increasingly concerned with the former.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%