2015
DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2015.7.3.006-049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional approach in economics and to economics. Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Underlying this goal was the need to identify similarities in engineering students' sources of stress and their approaches to maintaining their mental health. Our research design was guided by pragmatism, as we believe that (a) an objective reality exists but can only be encountered through subjective human experience [13], (b) beliefs and habits are socially constructed and subject to sociopolitical forces [14], (c) understanding the problem (i.e., treatment gap) and identifying practical solutions is the central priority [15], and (d) the best method (e.g., qualitative, quantitative) is the one most effective in achieving desired research outcomes [16]. Therefore, we used IBM as our guiding theoretical framework, semi-structured interviews as our method of data collection, and thematic analysis [17] to identify themes and patterns that could be used to organize and describe our data in rich detail.…”
Section: Theoretical Grounding and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying this goal was the need to identify similarities in engineering students' sources of stress and their approaches to maintaining their mental health. Our research design was guided by pragmatism, as we believe that (a) an objective reality exists but can only be encountered through subjective human experience [13], (b) beliefs and habits are socially constructed and subject to sociopolitical forces [14], (c) understanding the problem (i.e., treatment gap) and identifying practical solutions is the central priority [15], and (d) the best method (e.g., qualitative, quantitative) is the one most effective in achieving desired research outcomes [16]. Therefore, we used IBM as our guiding theoretical framework, semi-structured interviews as our method of data collection, and thematic analysis [17] to identify themes and patterns that could be used to organize and describe our data in rich detail.…”
Section: Theoretical Grounding and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. which are part of social constructs (Yefimov, 2004)and that therefore reality can never be determined by one thing (Pansiri, 2005). This why is pragmatic philosophy encourages a mixed method approach to research and completely rejects the notion that reality can be found using only a single scientific method (Maxcy, 2003).…”
Section: Research Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%