2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional assessment in natural resource governance: A conceptual overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, governance has increasingly been identified by scholars and practitioners as a lynchpin in the success of natural resource management. Indeed, recognising the widespread failures of historic 'top-down', technocratic and generally government-led management practices, in the last two decades many management groups and governments have adopted more participatory, collaborative, and polycentric governance arrangements (Bixler, 2014;Marcus & Onjala, 2008;Njaya, 2007;Robins, 2008;Yeboah-Assiamah et al, 2017). This radical shift in governance paradigms has involved significant experimentation with novel approaches to decision-making, with varying levels of success and influence on outcomes in social-ecological systems (Ison et al, 2015;McFadgen & Huitema, 2017;Mitchell et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, governance has increasingly been identified by scholars and practitioners as a lynchpin in the success of natural resource management. Indeed, recognising the widespread failures of historic 'top-down', technocratic and generally government-led management practices, in the last two decades many management groups and governments have adopted more participatory, collaborative, and polycentric governance arrangements (Bixler, 2014;Marcus & Onjala, 2008;Njaya, 2007;Robins, 2008;Yeboah-Assiamah et al, 2017). This radical shift in governance paradigms has involved significant experimentation with novel approaches to decision-making, with varying levels of success and influence on outcomes in social-ecological systems (Ison et al, 2015;McFadgen & Huitema, 2017;Mitchell et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a policy perspective, this suggests the need for a more differentiated appraisal of informal institutions (for example, Rohregger, 2006;Yeboah-Assiamah et al, 2017;Pfeiffer, 2011). They are an integral part of local power structures even where strong and functioning formal institutions exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature adopts an institutional approach to assess how governments adopt peculiar governance regimes (Ayana et al, 2017;Yeboah-Assiamah et al, 2017); assess the impact of actor networks in sustainable management of forests (Kathrin, 2019;Johansson, 2018;Mohammed et al, 2017). But the question which still remains inconclusively addressed in the literature is: what propels a sovereign country to incorporate non-legally binding international institutional arrangement into its own institutional and management practices?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%