2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional bricolage and the (Re)shaping of communal land tenure arrangements: Two contrasting cases in upland and lowland Northeastern Laos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Market bricolage was the act of using existing or unused resource to meet the new needs, or needs of marginalized customers (Grivins et al, 2017). Institutional bricolage was the act of firms that intentionally or unintentionally used whatever materials and resources available to assemble or reshape institutional arrangements (Suhardiman and Scurrah, 2021). Entrepreneurial bricolage implied that enterprises reconfigured undervalued, redundant and discarded resources, which facilitated their competitiveness and multiple value creation (Steffens et al, 2023).…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Bricolagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Market bricolage was the act of using existing or unused resource to meet the new needs, or needs of marginalized customers (Grivins et al, 2017). Institutional bricolage was the act of firms that intentionally or unintentionally used whatever materials and resources available to assemble or reshape institutional arrangements (Suhardiman and Scurrah, 2021). Entrepreneurial bricolage implied that enterprises reconfigured undervalued, redundant and discarded resources, which facilitated their competitiveness and multiple value creation (Steffens et al, 2023).…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Bricolagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Grivins et al (2017), entrepreneurial bricolage on family farms was a dynamic and practice-oriented concept that described the process by which matter was constantly being rediscovered and redefined. Based on a dynamic perspective, Suhardiman and Scurrah (2021) explained the process by which family farms used institutional bricolage to creatively reshape land use plans to manage risks and allocated resources for the benefit of themselves and society. Yachin and Ioannides (2020) found that farmers could make full use of undervalued resources to provide flexible production factors for family farms, thereby increasing the ability to create value.…”
Section: Entrepreneurial Bricolagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in studies by Ibrahim et al (2020), Olofsson, (2021 and Rignall and Kusunose (2018), the Governance of customary institutions in Ghana, West Africa, was also carried out in a collaborative method with the village government as motivation for community groups in facing the challenges of managing productive agricultural land sustainably. Policy and position of customary institutions (Po & Hickey, 2018;Bizoza & Opio-Omoding, 2021;Huntington & Marple-Cantrell, 2021;Suhardiman & Scurrah, 2021) states that customary institution policies are one of the very strategic policies for overcoming problems land ownership in agricultural Governance in the African Country of Ethiopia. Numerous studies such as, Khalid et al (2015), , Scheyvens et al (2020), Deininger et al (2021), also add to the role of customary institutions as agricultural resources for land use from a gender perspective in Malawi, an African country South that customary institutions manage agricultural land in achieving SDGs development.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Despite this progress, most countries in Africa have not embedded FPIC in their water or environmental laws, so the water tenure rights of many 9 Considerable work on the concept of institutional bricolage provides examples of adapting existing institutional frameworks to new needs. See Cleaver (2012); Merrey and Cook (2012); Suhardiman and Scurrah (2021). 10 The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) stipulates that "access to traditional knowledge, innovations and practices of indigenous and local communities should be subject to prior informed consent or prior informed approval from the holders of such knowledge, innovations and practices;" as well as FPIC in the context of genetic resources and the Conference of the Parties of the Convention have decided that FPIC should be implemented before certain activities related to indigenous knowledge and resettlement, among others (CBD 1992, Art.…”
Section: Strong Due Process Rights and Requirements (National And Tra...mentioning
confidence: 99%