2002
DOI: 10.5465/3069287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Change in Large Law Firms: A Resource Dependency and Institutional Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
150
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
150
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a study of the diffusion of human resource practices among law firms, Sherer and Lee (2002) failed to find support for the notion that competitive-technical pressures explained early, but not later, adoption. Similarly, Kraatz and Zajac (1996) found no link between technical variables and early versus late adoption of professional degree programs in American liberal arts colleges.…”
Section: Rethinking Adoption Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a study of the diffusion of human resource practices among law firms, Sherer and Lee (2002) failed to find support for the notion that competitive-technical pressures explained early, but not later, adoption. Similarly, Kraatz and Zajac (1996) found no link between technical variables and early versus late adoption of professional degree programs in American liberal arts colleges.…”
Section: Rethinking Adoption Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innym elementem, świadczącym o kulturze danej profesji, może być system awansowania profesjonalisty w strukturach firm profesjonalnych: np. w dużych kancelariach prawniczych (w przeciwieństwie do firm architektonicznych czy inżynierskich) jest stosowany sytem «up or out» (awans albo zwolnienie), [Sherer, Lee, 2002].…”
Section: Kultura Profesjonalnaunclassified
“…According to Sherer and Lee (2002), the scarcity of resources motivates, and legitimacy enables, institutional change; in their study, they find that innovation has occurred with prestigious companies that faced scarce resources and had the legitimacy to change the rules and resources. Lounsbury and Glynn (2001) argue that the institutional strategy of new entrepreneurs resides in the narratives they tell about their capital stock in order to legitimize their businesses; these narratives allow acquiring new capital and subsequently generating wealth and accumulation (of new capital).…”
Section: Institutional Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%