2016
DOI: 10.1177/0170840616663241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Complexity and Individual Responses: Delineating the Boundaries of Partial Autonomy

Abstract: 3Research highlights how co-existing institutional logics can sometimes offer opportunities for 4 agency to enterprising actors in organizational fields. But macro-and micro-level studies using 5 this framework diverge in their approach to understanding the consequences of institutional 6 complexity for actor autonomy, and correspondingly in the opportunities they identify for 7 agents to resist, reinterpret or make judicious use of institutional prescriptions. This paper seeks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…New modes of governing focused on physicians not only as objects but also as actors directly involved in governance (Kuhlmann et al 2013, McDonald et al 2008, Vicarelli and Pavolini 2017. As a result, boundaries between professionalism and managerialism and between professions and organisations are 'blurring' and new forms of more hybrid, integrated or transformative professionalism are emerging (Denis and van Gestel 2016, Kuhlmann and Burau 2015, Martin et al 2017, Noordegraaf 2015, Waring and Currie 2009). The various forms of integration of managerial and professional governance tools may create new and hitherto unknown alliances between NPM and other political agendas like populism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New modes of governing focused on physicians not only as objects but also as actors directly involved in governance (Kuhlmann et al 2013, McDonald et al 2008, Vicarelli and Pavolini 2017. As a result, boundaries between professionalism and managerialism and between professions and organisations are 'blurring' and new forms of more hybrid, integrated or transformative professionalism are emerging (Denis and van Gestel 2016, Kuhlmann and Burau 2015, Martin et al 2017, Noordegraaf 2015, Waring and Currie 2009). The various forms of integration of managerial and professional governance tools may create new and hitherto unknown alliances between NPM and other political agendas like populism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the logic of managerialism has driven the introduction of market and competition, which, in England, translates into the commissioning of health services (Allen et al, 2017). The commissioning function that some medical professionals are required to assume is thus part of the logic of managerialism (Martin, Currie, Weaver, Finn, & McDonald, 2017).…”
Section: Institutional Logics and It Innovation In Health Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational actors are exposed to these multiple logics through the processes of learning and socialization (Thornton and Ocasio ). As each logic provides “a set of organizing principles for a realm of social life” (Besharov and Smith , 366)—so‐called cognitive or decision frames (Gioia ; Weick , )—organizational actors have alternative ways of making sense of what they experience (Weick ; Ford and Ford ; Martin et al ).…”
Section: Institutional Logics As Frames Of Reference Priming and Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions that present conceptual and empirical efforts to bring the individual back into institutional theory include the sense‐making literature (Hallett and Ventresca ) and the literature on institutional entrepreneurship (Greenwood and Suddaby ). Much of this literature, however, implicitly assumes a significant degree of autonomy on the part of organizational actors (Martin et al ), with little or no appreciation of the possibility of heteronomy despite compelling research in cognitive and social psychology that suggests nonconscious processes operating alongside conscious thinking and reasoning (Kahneman ; Loersch and Payne ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%