Systemic Risk, Institutional Design, and the Regulation of Financial Markets 2016
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777625.003.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Design and the New Systemic Risk in Banking Crises

Abstract: who describes systemic risk as "the probability that the financial system is unable to support economic activity": Mark Carney, cited in Nikil Chande, Nicholas Labelle, and Eric Tuer, Central Counterparties and Systemic Risk (Bank of Canada, Financial System Review, December 2001) at 1; Ben Bernanke, who advocates for a broad definition that includes "developments that threaten the stability of the financial system as a whole and consequently the broader economy":

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single-entity approach has some advantages. It creates clarity of responsibility in identifying risks and implementing policies (IMF 2011), and is administratively simple and cost-minimizing (Anand et al 2014). Furthermore, it serves to eliminate regulatory gaps and ensure policy consistency, thereby reducing regulatory arbitrage (Anand et al 2014; see also Pan 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-entity approach has some advantages. It creates clarity of responsibility in identifying risks and implementing policies (IMF 2011), and is administratively simple and cost-minimizing (Anand et al 2014). Furthermore, it serves to eliminate regulatory gaps and ensure policy consistency, thereby reducing regulatory arbitrage (Anand et al 2014; see also Pan 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%