2010
DOI: 10.1787/5kmbqvstc09x-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Determinants of Worker Flows

Abstract: JT03286526 SUMMARYThere is little cross-country comparative evidence on the way labour market institutions shape gross job and worker flows, by and large because comparable data for many countries are scarce. By using a unique harmonised dataset on hirings and separations at the industry-level for a large majority of OECD countries, we fill this gap, by analysing the role of a number of labour and product market institutions in shaping cross-country differences in gross worker flows. In order to identify the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY POLICY PAPERS Bassanini et al (2010) use a harmonised dataset on hirings and separations at the industry-level in OECD countries to analyse how labour-market institutions affect gross job and worker flows. The results suggests that cross-country differences in job protection for open-ended contracts and unemployment benefits can explain a large share of cross-country variation in gross worker flows, although the effect of the former is largely limited to job-to-job flows, as opposed to job-to-jobless or jobless-to-job transitions.…”
Section: Cross-country Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OECD SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY POLICY PAPERS Bassanini et al (2010) use a harmonised dataset on hirings and separations at the industry-level in OECD countries to analyse how labour-market institutions affect gross job and worker flows. The results suggests that cross-country differences in job protection for open-ended contracts and unemployment benefits can explain a large share of cross-country variation in gross worker flows, although the effect of the former is largely limited to job-to-job flows, as opposed to job-to-jobless or jobless-to-job transitions.…”
Section: Cross-country Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hiring rate is defined as the ratio of workers with less than one year of tenure to the average industry employment in t-1 and t. The separation rate is the difference between the hiring rate and rate of change in employment. Source: Bassanini and Garnero (2013 [33]).…”
Section: Annex B Glossary Active Labour Market Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%