2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional development and firm profitability in transition economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since their analysis was conducted on disaggregated data, the impact of institutional factors on firm performance, represented by their bilateral international trade, might be considered as potentially impacting their ability to survive in the market as well. A similar analogy can be drawn from the empirical evidence presented by Kafouros and Aliyev (2016), who showed that domestic firms in 16 CEE economies benefit from improvements in institutional environments.…”
Section: Institutionssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Since their analysis was conducted on disaggregated data, the impact of institutional factors on firm performance, represented by their bilateral international trade, might be considered as potentially impacting their ability to survive in the market as well. A similar analogy can be drawn from the empirical evidence presented by Kafouros and Aliyev (2016), who showed that domestic firms in 16 CEE economies benefit from improvements in institutional environments.…”
Section: Institutionssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…We also interact the different degree of family involvement with the degree of diversity of exposure to PR to test the moderating effect proposed in Hypothesis . Following Aiken and West () and Kafourus and Aliyev (), we mean centered the components of the interaction term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our research has provided some evidence of the validity of the VIS taxonomy in explaining firm performance in understudied economies, future researchers may wish to revisit the taxonomy itself to explore whether cluster analysis based on a richer characterization of institutions can provide an equally valid but more fine-grained specification of institutional systems in understudied economies. Also, we have not addressed the question of institutional dynamics and institutional change, which can affect firm performance (Kafouros & Aliyev, 2016) and firm ownership (Driffield, Mickiewicz & Temouri, 2016), and in turn change configuration identity and impact.…”
Section: Institutional Configurations and Foreign Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%