2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional environment, firm ownership, and IPO first-day returns: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the measurement of InsE, most of the existing studies use the score of marketization index, especially in the Chinese research setting (Chen et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2017;Zeng et al, 2019)…”
Section: Institutional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the measurement of InsE, most of the existing studies use the score of marketization index, especially in the Chinese research setting (Chen et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2017;Zeng et al, 2019)…”
Section: Institutional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also follow Chen et al (2014), and examine in Table 4, Panel B the performance differences for firms controlled by the central and local governments. We find that firms controlled by local government have better performance at 10% significance level and higher productivity at 5% level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide additional evidence of the effect of local government quality, we also use the marketization variable (NERIIM), which provides a measure of the degree to which the provincial economy is subject to market mechanisms. Marketization has been used in a recent working paper analyzing its firm effect (Cheng, Wang, Li, & Tong, 2014). Since the NERIIM has changed its methodology significantly after 1999, we use the 1999 NERIIM [5]…”
Section: Quality Of Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually owned by the local governments [44] in the different provinces/municipalities and referred to as local SOEs (LSOEs), many comparisons have been made between SOEs and non-communist owned firms in OECD countries on topics as diverse as initial public offering (IPO) stock performance [45], due diligence and accounting challenges [46], executive compensation [47], and corporate social responsibility reporting [42].…”
Section: Chinese State-owned Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 very large and/or nationally important SOEs are managed/overseen centrally by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) at a central government level and these firms are referred to as the Central SOEs (CSOEs). SASAC and CSOEs are defined as well as discussed in a number of papers as these papers review topics, such as firm ownership structure [43], stock market listing [45], financial performance [48], audit quality [49], and social as well as environmental reporting [42].…”
Section: Chinese State-owned Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%