2019
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1541231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional factors affecting urban green space provision – from a local government revenue perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that public land is highly suitable for urban green space development as compared to private land (Chandio et al 2011). The study undertaken by Wang and Chan (2019) suggest that the situation with initial public land ownership status backed up by regulatory instruments is more advantageous for providing urban green spaces than that with the initial private land ownership status relying on market-based instruments. On the basis of this claim, in this study public land is considered as highly suitable and private land has considered as moderately suitable for selecting optimal location for urban green spaces in the town (Fig.…”
Section: Suitability Values Of Each Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that public land is highly suitable for urban green space development as compared to private land (Chandio et al 2011). The study undertaken by Wang and Chan (2019) suggest that the situation with initial public land ownership status backed up by regulatory instruments is more advantageous for providing urban green spaces than that with the initial private land ownership status relying on market-based instruments. On the basis of this claim, in this study public land is considered as highly suitable and private land has considered as moderately suitable for selecting optimal location for urban green spaces in the town (Fig.…”
Section: Suitability Values Of Each Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, municipal land ownership, as dominant in Amsterdam, appears to play an important role in the potential for regulation, land-use guidance, and overcoming land-price barriers. Land ownership is highlighted as an important factor by Wang and Chan (2019) in mitigating the cost burden of greenspace development in areas with high landprices. Secondly, the more centralized governance structure in Amsterdam compared to Brussels may explain lower rates of greenspace loss, through more coordinated citywide policy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High land prices accompanied by strong housing demand make it financially less lucrative to develop/preserve greenspace, even where the positive impacts of UGS are recognized by municipal authorities. Additionally, developing UGS has been more successful in contexts where the local government owns a large amount of land (as it does not have the be bought first to develop UGS), alongside stronger regulatory potential for public space demands on development (Wang and Chan 2019;Gerber and Gerber 2017).…”
Section: Urban Greenspace and Causes Of Its Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this experience can provide good opportunities for the emerging towns to upgrade the skills of the professionals found in the department of greenery by signing a memorandum with the Kotebe Metropolitan University and others. Lastly, public land ownership status backed up by regulatory instruments is more advantageous for providing adequate UGI components than that of the private land ownership status relying on market-based instruments [102]. Therefore, since the government is the owner of the land in Ethiopia, it is possible to provide accessible and suability UGI components for the community in the study area.…”
Section: Opportunities To Implement the Strategic Approaches In The Emerging Townsmentioning
confidence: 99%