2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12197-015-9332-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional investors’ activism and credit ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A general argument in this field is that the activism of institutional investors can provide benefits to shareholders ( Becht et al, 2008 ; Buchanan et al, 2012 ; Brav et al, 2018 ). However, there is also opposite evidence to the contrary ( Gillan and Starks, 2007 ; Farooqi et al, 2017 ; Routledge, 2020 ). In Korea, NPF declared its investment direction with regard to corporate ESG activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A general argument in this field is that the activism of institutional investors can provide benefits to shareholders ( Becht et al, 2008 ; Buchanan et al, 2012 ; Brav et al, 2018 ). However, there is also opposite evidence to the contrary ( Gillan and Starks, 2007 ; Farooqi et al, 2017 ; Routledge, 2020 ). In Korea, NPF declared its investment direction with regard to corporate ESG activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Many prior studies tried to investigate the effective governance role of institutional investors. The general argument is that institutional investor activism can provide benefits to shareholders ( Becht et al, 2008 ; Buchanan et al, 2012 ; Brav et al, 2018 ), but there is also opposite evidence ( Gillan and Starks, 2007 ; Farooqi et al, 2017 ; Routledge, 2020 ). For example, Mehrani et al (2017) divided institutional investors into active institutional investors and passive institutional investors, and they reported that active institutional investors had a positive effect on earning quality, but passive institutional investors did not.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They concluded that a higher protection of debtholders' rights generally reduces bond yield-spreads and increases bond ratings. www.hrmars.com Farooqi, Jory and Ngo (2015) study the association between institutional shareholdings and credit ratings. They classified the institutional investors based on their degree of intervention and activism levels and found that passive investors are associated with better-rated firms while active ones are associated with lower-rated firms.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%