Institutional Investors and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence from Toxics Release Data

Abstract

This paper studies the role of institutional investors in influencing corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies by analyzing the relation between institutional ownership and toxic release from facilities to which institutions are geographically proximate. We develop a local preference hypothesis based on the delegated philanthropy and transaction-costs theories. Consistent with the hypothesis, local institutional ownership is negatively related to facility toxic release. The negative relation is stronger for local SRI funds, local public pension funds, and local dedicated institutions. We also find that the relation is more negative in communities that prefer more stringent environmental policies and in communities of greater collective cohesiveness. Local institutional ownership, particularly local ownerships by SRI funds and public pension funds, is positively related to the probability that an ESG proposal is either introduced or withdrawn. The paper sheds light on the drivers behind institutions' ESG engagement and their effectiveness in influencing ESG.

Green Innovation and the Value of Multinationality

“…Our result suggests that the MNCs' home country government plays an important role in determining the quality of its corporate environmental strategies. Overall, our findings are consistent with the viewpoints found in the existing studies (e.g., Christmann, 2004;Kim et al, 2019).…”

Fighting Climate Change with Disclosure? The Real Effects of Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure

“…Prior literature shows that investors consider environmental risks in their investment decisions as indicated by a positive association of environmental risks with cost of capital (Sharfman and Fernando, 2008) and negative association with a firm's market value. In addition, shareholders and other stakeholders have social preferences for low emissions beyond their financial or risk implications, i.e., shareholders and stakeholders do not only care about payoffs but also about an ethical behavior of the firm (Kim et al, 2019). Friedman and Heinle (2016) show in an analytical model how investor preferences for non-cash flow-based activities like CSR can influence market prices and in turn, induce managers to undertake these activities.…”

Minding the gap: Asymmetric effects of pay dispersion on stakeholder engagement in corporate environmental (Ir)responsibility

“…Corporate social performance has received increasing attention from practitioners and academic scholars over the past decades. While scholars have regarded and operationalized corporate social performance as a multidimensional concept, recently, considerable attention has been paid to corporate environmental performance (e.g., Duanmu, Bu, & Pittman, 2018; Heikkurinen, 2010; Kim, Wan, Wang, & Yang, 2019; Schilke, 2018). In 2019, Fortune issued a list of “Sustainability All‐Stars” comprising firms (e.g., Philips NV, IBM, Intel, and Wal‐Mart) with the highest scores in the Sustainability Leadership Monitor based on their environmental innovation, resource use, and emissions reduction.…”

“…Corporate environmental performance is attracting remarkable attention from academic scholars across different disciplines, such as strategic management, marketing, finance, and organizational behavior (e.g., Cho, Cho, & Lee, 2019; Cho Earnhart & Lizal, 2006; Wahba, 2008; Yang, Li, Yu, Zeng, & Sun, 2019). Studies document that corporate environmental performance is affected by government ownership, administrative hierarchical distance, and external monitoring (e.g., Babiak & Trendafilova, 2011; Duanmu et al, 2018; Kim et al, 2019; Schilke, 2018; Wang, Wijen, & Heugens, 2018). Given that corporate environmental strategy is one of the most important decisions that top executives make, numerous studies also present how executive characteristics, such as CEO educational background (e.g., MBA and law degree) and CEO tenure, affect corporate environmental practices and generate important insights.…”