Institutional isomorphism and cash management practices in Mississippi

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to draw on the theory of institutional isomorphism to investigate how Mississippi’s centralized cash management policy affects the cash management practices in the state’s rural and urban counties. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a sequential exploratory mixed methods design involving a qualitative documentary analysis and a quantitative analysis of a survey of Mississippi counties. Findings The study finds that institutional isomorphism drives cash management practices in the counties by influencing how they follow state and agency mandates. Moreover, while urban counties have superior socio-economic indicators compared to their rural counterparts, no differences exist regarding standardized financial indicators, which suggest that local governments in the state may be imitating the practices of one another. Practical implications First, states should consider the different financial and economic conditions of their local governments when prescribing cash management policies because uniform policies could stifle local innovation and reduce efficiency in cash management. Second, when there is pressure from a higher-level government or a state agency, local governments may end up imitating one another rather than exploring opportunities for innovation within state policies. Third, state policies should consider requiring education and training in cash management practices that help identify strategies to add value to public funds within the scope of local fiscal capabilities. Originality/value The study uses one state to investigate a unique case of centralized cash management practices. The lessons learned can apply to other states seeking to develop a policy for their small local governments without placing the larger ones at a disadvantage.

Coordination Effectiveness During Public Health Emergencies: An Institutional Collective Action Framework

“…Although a difference is reported among emergency management and public health professionals favoring the former, this is weak as is the strength of association (χ 2 = 9.33; p < .1; Somers’ D = 0.05). The lack of significance regarding these indicators may be because professional training levels off any differences that these variables might cause and confirm what prior studies have found about professional training as a source of normative and mimetic isomorphism (Nukpezah & Abutabenjeh, 2018).…”

“…Like previous studies, the study finds merit in measuring coordination effectiveness using professional informed judgment in their role representing their organizations (K. Kim et al, 2017; Nukpezah & Abutabenjeh, 2018), which makes the variable latent.…”

“…Finally, extant scholarship have suggested that professional opinions are important and often inform decisions (Kwon & Feiock, 2010; Nukpezah & Abutabenjeh, 2018). Moreover, the ICA framework assumes that local governments are represented by individual actors and have identifiable interests, perceptions and divergent interests within the community (Feiock, 2013; Kwon & Feiock, 2010).…”

Determinants of network effectiveness: evidence from a benchmarking consortium

“…A total of 124 respondents, representing about 38% response rate, completed the survey. The response rate compares well with previous surveys of local government officials (Nukpezah and Abutabenjeh, 2018). Some respondents did not complete the personal information section, but the results indicate that the respondents were gender-balanced (52% male and 44% female) and were representative of the types of local government represented in the network (48% county employees and 52% city employees).…”

Do Smart Cities Technologies Contribute to Local Economic Development?

“…With the increasing use of technology in contemporary public management, the connection between the use of smart cities technologies and economic development needs further articulation. Because local economic development policy decisions are made by city officials whose professional training and opinions influence policies that are advocated and eventually passed (Nukpezah & Abutabenjeh, 2018; Pagano & Bowman, 1995), their perceptions about the connection between smart cities technologies and economic development likely influence policy priorities and budgetary allocations and are, therefore, important. Consequently, research that focuses on the innovative use of technology in fostering economic development in local governments is essential, particularly with reference to the perception of chief administrative officers (CAOs).…”