Institutional logics in the open science practices of university–industry research collaboration

Abstract

As an emerging agenda in science and public policy discourse, the open science (OS) movement has affected university–industry research collaboration (UIRC) including normative changes concerning actors’ value and belief systems. Thus, the following questions have become pertinent: what are the norms and beliefs of key actors engaged in UIRC regarding OS practices? How have the norms and beliefs led to tensions in UIRC and dynamics facilitating or impeding OS? This study explores these questions through two case studies by applying institutional logics theory as an analytical lens. Through analysing case studies concerning UIRC in Finland, a pioneer in the global OS movement, six institutional logics that are either pro- or contra-OS practices were identified: the state, market, corporation, profession, traditional trust–based community and sustainability-based community logics. The strongest tensions are between the state and market logics and between the profession and market logics. In the end of the study, recommendations are solicited for OS policymakers and practitioners based on the research findings.

Fostering Open Data Practices in Research-Performing Organizations

“…The open science movement has also targeted collaborations between universities and industry while involving several influencing factors facilitating open data practices with the given examples of state, corporation, profession, and sustainability-based community logic, with the latter holding the potential to overcome other barriers [15]. As such, sustainable values not only foster open science practices but also support the societal transformation towards sustainability, which, in turn, facilitates open knowledge sharing independently of the openness movement.…”