Institutional quality and innovation: evidence from Emilia-Romagna

Mosconi, Franco; D’Ingiullo, Dario

doi:10.1080/10438599.2021.1893140

Cited by 20 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Institutional support system (Shin 2004 ; Lobe and Berkes 2004 ; Xie 2006 ; Malva et al 2013; Lisowska and Stanisławski 2014 ; Barros 2015 ; Juk and Fuck 2015 ; Ferguson and Carnabuci 2017 ; Fischer and Tello-Gamarra 2017 ; Huang et al 2017 ; Salandra 2018 ; Ervits and Zmuda 2018 ; Rodríguez-Pose and Zhang 2020 ; Ruan and Liu 2021 ; Mosconi and D’Ingiullo 2021 )…”

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Topically, the most investigated category of determinants and independent variables is institutional quality and control that influences efficiency and dexterity of innovation inputs. Studies focus on institutional quality because empirical evidence suggests this concept influences the ability of firms to acquire advanced technologies (Wu et al 2016 ; Kawabata and Camargo Junior 2020 ) along with the probability, capacity, and intensity of innovation (Rodríguez-Pose and Zhang 2020 ; Mosconi and D’Ingiullo 2021 ). Total quality management (TQM) offers a critical paradigm for ensuring quality (Wiklund et al 2003 ; Sharma et al 2010 ; Kasperavičiūtė-Černiauskienė and Serafinas 2018 ) while control is a determinant that investigative studies generally agree on but underscore in varying research foci.…”

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(continued)Wu et al 2015; d'Agostino and Scarlato 2019) Capabilities(Li 2015;Yeung 2015;Petruzzelli and Rotolo 2015;Aragon- Correa and la Hiz 2016; He 2018) Policies (De Mothe 1995;Kafouros et al 2015;Arribas 2020) Technology(Mutenje et al 2016;Hinings et al 2018) Actors (de Zubielqui et al 2015van Wijk et al 2019;Wu and Park 2019) Studies focus on institutional quality because empirical evidence suggests this concept influences the ability of firms to acquire advanced technologies(Wu et al 2016;Kawabata and Camargo Junior 2020) along with the probability, capacity, and intensity of innovation (Rodríguez-Pose and Zhang 2020;Mosconi and D'Ingiullo 2021). Total quality management (TQM) offers a critical paradigm for ensuring quality(Wiklund et al 2003;Sharma et al 2010; Kasperavičiūtė-Černiauskienė and Serafinas 2018) while control is a determinant that investigative studies generally agree on but underscore in varying research foci.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Institutional innovation creates smart institutions that idiosyncratically thrive in a world of exponential change. Through policy-driven interventions and experiential learning, managers of institutions become adept at delivering praxis- and crisis-driven innovations required for survival and success. Similarly, the management of institutional innovation remains an interest in research due to links of this form of innovation to economic growth, and the demands of on-going major socioeconomic transformations due to technological advances, increased occurrences of major crises, and emerging socioeconomic challenges. Accordingly, a key question arising from the literature concerns the range of determinants and priorities that influence institutional innovation for delivering society value. Thus, the onus is on scholarship to capture and advance knowledge for harnessing the potency of institutional innovation. The purpose of this article is to analyse the current state of research on institutional innovation. Using the systematic review methodology, we identify and critically appraise 485 peer-reviewed scientific publications between 1969 and 2021. The review finds key determinants and management priorities with a view to developing a multi-level management model of institutional innovation. Guided by insights from the review, the article sets a research agenda for future management studies of institutional innovation.

show abstract

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

AlMalki

Durugbo

2022

Manag Rev Q

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Emilia-Romagna has a long history of cooperativism, and cooperatives account for 30% of the region's Gross Domestic Product [39]. Over the years, Emilia-Romagna has emerged as the Italian region with the highest number of cooperative enterprises [40]. The region is also a forerunner in terms of IBOs, as it is the only Italian regional government to have approved local regulations on IBOs (Regional Law No 24/2000) [33].…”

Section: Ibos Establishment Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Governance in the Italian Processed Tomato Value Chain: The Case for an Interbranch Organisation

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collective action among producers is a corrective measure for power imbalance, which affects primary producers in agro-food supply chains. As associations of producers and processors, Interbranch Organisations (IBOs) promote dialogue, best practice, and market transparency. However, interbranch cooperation is still a less explored subject in agro-food governance studies. Therefore, the present paper aims to analyse the role of IBO North Italy for Processing Tomato (IBO NIPT) in the governance of the processed tomato value chain. The IBO for Processing Tomatoes of Northern Italy was chosen as a case study as it is one of the eight recognized IBOs in the country and Italy is the third biggest producer of tomatoes for processing worldwide. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in the processed tomato value chain were carried out to reach this aim. Abridged transcripts were analysed through thematic analysis by two or three researchers. The present study has three research steps: first, to explore the history of the IBO NIPT; second, to explore its current role as collective institution acting towards power imbalances; third, the IBO’s role in reference price streamlining. A multi-theoretical approach based on the following three theoretical frameworks was used to analyse the interviews: New Institutional Economics (NIE); Devaux’s framework for collective action; and Transaction Cost Economics. The paper highlights the role of local institutions in bringing innovations in the food supply chain and suggests that the future of IBOs in Italy has to be expanded beyond reference price streamlining and could benefit from the cooperation of retailers.

show abstract

“…The literature has demonstrated that these determinants are not mutually exclusive (Fadiran and Akanbi, 2017); rather in many cases they are complementary to each other. Importantly, institutional quality (IQ) has been recognized as a precondition for the investment that leads to the accumulation of the endogenous determinants of innovation and human capital development as well as macroeconomic stability (Schumpeter, 1934, Acemoglu et al, 2005Kim and Loayza, 2017;and Mosconi and D'Ingiullo, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Instiutions: the Role of Institutional Quality in Technical Progress in the American Region

Padilla,

Carrington,

Leiva

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technical progress, often measured through changes in total factor productivity (TFP), has been extensively examined within the economic literature. Researchers have proposed that institutional quality is a key driver of TFP. Specifically, while institutions influence business efficiency, financial sector dynamics, and human capital development, they are also critical to providing the conditions that incentivize cooperation and innovation, in turn, augmenting TFP. This study undertakes an examination of the nexus between institutional quality (IQ) and TFP growth across a sample of 20 countries situated in the Americas using annual data from 2002 to 2019. The findings of this study substantiate the premise that enhanced IQ engenders an upswing in the rate of TFP growth, even after controlling for key production inputs, trade integration and macroeconomic conditions. In particular, institutions that promote citizen voice and authority accountability, and nurture a positive perception of the public sector's efficacy, reflecting trust in the state’s competency, are found to be key drivers of productivity growth within the American region. JEL codes: O47; OO43; E0.

show abstract

Institutional quality and innovation: evidence from Emilia-Romagna

Cited by 20 publications

References 78 publications

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model

Governance in the Italian Processed Tomato Value Chain: The Case for an Interbranch Organisation

Instiutions: the Role of Institutional Quality in Technical Progress in the American Region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About