2005
DOI: 10.1080/13600820500242746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional reasons for the effect of environmental regulations: Passenger car CO 2 emissions in the European Union, United States and Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 This is based on comparing fuel consumption and distance traveled versus tax and price changes. A more extended analysis is provided in Mikler (2005), based on data from the OECD (2002a). 11 Since 1983, car firms have paid more than US$590m in penalties, suggesting that they in turn are less willing participants in regulatory outcomes than is the case in the EU and Japan, considered below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 This is based on comparing fuel consumption and distance traveled versus tax and price changes. A more extended analysis is provided in Mikler (2005), based on data from the OECD (2002a). 11 Since 1983, car firms have paid more than US$590m in penalties, suggesting that they in turn are less willing participants in regulatory outcomes than is the case in the EU and Japan, considered below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… This is based on comparing fuel consumption and distance traveled versus tax and price changes. A more extended analysis is provided in Mikler (2005), based on data from the OECD (2002a). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have examined environmental regulations in the European and global car industry (e.g., Mikler, 2005Mikler, , 2009Levy & Rothenberg, 2002;Paterson, 2007;ten Brink, 2010). Paterson (2007) focuses primarily on the U.S. and global car industries, not on EU policies.…”
Section: Explanatory Perspectives and Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emissions standards force automotive manufacturers to comply with certain environmental performance measures, but at the same time, they often leave the options open on how to reach the required outcomes using different technological solutions (Lee et al, 2011). As one of the most regulated industries, emission standards came in the form of technology-forcing regulations and resulted in significant technological advancements to reduce emissions from motor vehicles during the past few decades (Bauner et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2011Lee et al, , 2010Mikler, 2009;Boulton et al, 1992;Touchton, 1981). Nevertheless, these advancements still rely on the interactions among a large number of public and private actors at different levels of influence who engage in processes of regulatory provisioning with varying degrees of political impact (Meadowcroft, 2011;Ng, 2006).…”
Section: Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended workshop with participants from 11 organizations discussing different scenarios for electric bus implementation Buhr, 2012;Delmas and Toffel, 2004;Heritier, 2003;Hey et al, 2007;Kuhlmann and Edler, 2003) ii See for example: Delmas, 2002;Gerard and Lave, 2005;Gordon, 1986;Kagan, 2000;Ng, 2006;Nivola, 1986;Riddlesperger, 1988;Touchton, 1981;Vogel, 1986) iii See for example: Kagan, 2000;Naturv rdsverket, 2005;Mikler, 2009Mikler, , 2005Pohl and Yarime, 2012;Boulton et al, 1992;Massini et al, 2002) …”
Section: May 2018mentioning
confidence: 99%