Institutional reforms and income distribution: Evidence from post-transition EU countries

Abstract

This paper provides an explanation of income dynamics in the posttransition EU countries from the perspective of institutional changes. As a result of seemingly-unrelated regressions analysis on panel data from 1990-2014, we find robust evidence of the relationship between income shares and institutional reforms. The impact of reforms on the top and below-average income shares is negative, whereas this effect on above above-average income share is positive. Decline of income share for the richest class during the post-transitional period can be attributed to the loss of privileges associated with the existence of an institutional vacuum in the first years of transition. Although transition increased wages for workers at the end of income distribution, the job losses had a stronger effect than wage increase, so the overall effect on income share of this group is negative. The winners of reforms appear as the workers with above-average income, whose skills are complementary to the changes instituted by transition to market economy and integration in the EU. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 47010]

Distributional effects of foreign versus domestic investment: Evidence from post-communist EU member states

“…The first years of economic reforms in the transition countries were characterized by a significant increase in income inequality (for example, Francisco H. G. Ferreira 1999;Maria Ivanova 2007;Branko Milanovic and Lire Ersado 2012), and accompanied by rapid and large penetration of FDI (Hans-Werner Sinn and Alfons J. Weichenrieder 1997; Nauro F. Campos and Fabrizio Coricelli 2002;Florian Dorn, Clemens Fuest, and Niklas Potrafke 2018;Kosta Josifidis, Novica Supić, and Slađana Bodor 2020). Parallel dynamics of income inequality and FDI inflows suggest the potential link between these two variables and initiates research in this area.…”

Labour market flexibilization and income distribution in Europe

“…167-185 human capital and competences; also profit-led and export-led growth). In addition to political processes and behaviours, institutional inertia, changes and social conventions about inequality; macroeconomic policies, labour market institutions and regulations, macroeconomic conditions (mainly, inflation and unemployment rates), redistribution policies, changes in taxation, public spending and social policies, and immigration (Josifidis, Supić, and Emilija Beker Pucar 2017;Kristal and Cohen 2017;Anthony Roberts and Roy Kwon 2017;Manuel Carlos Nogueira and Óscar Afonso 2018;Elena Bárcena-Martín, Natalia Martín-Fuentes, and Salvador Pérez-Moreno 2019;Ennis, Gonzaha, and Pike 2019;Furceri and Ostry 2019;Nolan, Matteo G. Richiardi, and Valenzuela 2019;Natalija Novta and Evgenia Pugacheva 2019;Josifidis, Supić, and Slađana Bodor 2020;Göran Therborn 2020;Tridico 2020).…”