Institutional Resilience and Economic Systems: Lessons from Elinor Ostrom’s Work

Abstract

Comparative economic systems literature deals extensively with 'systemic functions' and 'performance criteria' such as growth, efficiency and equity but rarely mentions the topic of resilience. This paper focusses on the issue of resilience while drawing several important lessons from the contributions in this respect of 2009 Nobel Prize in Economics co-recipient, Elinor Ostrom: The effects of alternative institutional arrangements and social norms as a source of both resilience and vulnerability; the problem of 'highly optimized tolerance' to specific sources of uncertainty; polycentricity as a possible structural solution to sustainability problems. A key point is that resilience is more than mere 'absorptive capacity' or 'speed of recovery': it depends on innovation and creative socio-cultural adaptations made possible by flexible and polycentric institutional processes. That has important implications for the ways we define and assess institutional performance and institutional design. Comparative Economic Studies (2014) 56, 52-76.

Adaptation with robustness: the case for clarity on the use of ‘resilience’ in health systems and global health

“…For us, resilience implies adaptability in a context of robustness. 14 But only the first half of this definition—adaptability—has dominated conversations among both enthusiasts and critics. To be resilient, a system must have both, that is, a resilient system is adaptable by being robust.…”

Polycentric Sovereignty: The Medieval Constitution, Governance Quality, and the Wealth of Nations

“…A constitution will be characterized by polycentric sovereignty when sovereign governance providers interact within an overarching framework of rules (Ostrom, ; see also Aligica and Tarko, ). Such a constitution will be self‐enforcing.…”

“…We emphasize three features of the medieval constitution. First, governance provision was polycentric , that is, characterized by fractured, overlapping, and concurrent political power (Ostrom, , ; see also Aligica and Tarko, ) . Second, governance providers had residual claimancy : their political property rights were bundled with economic property rights (Salter, ).…”

Polycentric Governance Approaches for a Low-Carbon Transition: The Roles of Community-Based Energy Initiatives in Enhancing the Resilience of Future Energy Systems

“…This last principle, which refers to the concept of "polycentricity", is, according to Aligica and Tarko (2014), the most distinctive feature of the Ostromian approach to resilience. Polycentricity describes the coexistence of many self-organized and autonomous centers of decision making, all operating under an overarching set of shared rules (Ostrom et al 1961).…”