Institutionalization of evidence-informed practices in healthcare settings

Abstract

BackgroundThe effective and timely integration of the best available research evidence into healthcare practice has considerable potential to improve the quality of provided care. Knowledge translation (KT) approaches aim to develop, implement, and evaluate strategies to address the research-practice gap. However, most KT research has been directed toward implementation strategies that apply cognitive, behavioral, and, to a lesser extent, organizational theories. In this paper, we discuss the potential of institutional theory to inform KT-related research.DiscussionDespite significant research, there is still much to learn about how to achieve KT within healthcare systems and practices. Institutional theory, focusing on the processes by which new ideas and concepts become accepted within their institutional environments, holds promise for advancing KT efforts and research. To propose new directions for future KT research, we present some of the main concepts of institutional theory and discuss their application to KT research by outlining how institutionalization of new practices can lead to their ongoing use in organizations. In addition, we discuss the circumstances under which institutionalized practices dissipate and give way to new insights and ideas that can lead to new, more effective practices.SummaryKT research informed by institutional theory can provide important insights into how knowledge becomes implemented, routinized, and accepted as institutionalized practices. Future KT research should employ both quantitative and qualitative research designs to examine the specifics of sustainability, institutionalization, and deinstitutionalization of practices to enhance our understanding of these complex constructs.

Extent and application of ICU diaries in Germany in 2014

“…An interesting feature, however, is the tenacity of nurses who have pursued the idea of ICU diaries and gained ownership during an evolving process of concept development (McEvoy et al , ). This can be interpreted as cultural process and successful implementation (Novotna et al , ). Especially the public information in newspapers and television has been valuable during the process.…”

Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: a realist informed review

“…Health care organizations are proposed to be amongst the most complex of environments for knowledge translation [19]. Hierarchical reporting structures, multiple local practice cultures, disciplinary cultures and norms, external influences (political, legislative) all contribute to this complexity [23,24]. These complexities can render implementation outcomes vulnerable to modification, erosion, incomplete uptake and a return to pre-implementation behaviours [25].…”

Implementing an initiative promote evidence-informed practice: part 2—healthcare professionals’ perspectives of the evidence rounds programme

“…Research has consistently shown that contextual factors in a given setting play a large role in the success or failure of these types of activities. We employed qualitative methods of research as a means to gain understanding of interactions between individuals, organisations and their unique contexts [35]. The key finding of studies that have undertaken process evaluations is not only the significance of contextual factors but the fact that they can often have the most significant impact on the intervention [14].…”