2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2025327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions and Efficiency in Transition Economies

Abstract: This paper analyzes the effects of political and economic institutions on efficiency of transition economies over the 1995-2005 period. Perpetual Inventory Method is used to construct capital series for these countries, and then stochastic production frontier analysis is used to estimate the efficiency scores and effects of institutions at the same time. The empirical results show that better institutions are associated with higher efficiency. However, all else equal, the transition countries in East Asia are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two extracted components, which by construction are independent of each other, were then fed into the regression analysis to test the hypothesized relationships, an approach similar to that used in prior studies in extant literature on institutions and international economics (Dang, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two extracted components, which by construction are independent of each other, were then fed into the regression analysis to test the hypothesized relationships, an approach similar to that used in prior studies in extant literature on institutions and international economics (Dang, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally regional-based institutions (COMIFAC) are those built to promote cooperation between the Central African countries. Assessing the efficiency of institutional structures requires, first, an identification of their responsibilities and means of action [24] [25]. In Cameroon, the responsibilities of the state-based institutions are 1) to design and provide a follow-up in implementation of forest policy; 2) to ensure the control of actors involved in the sector and 3) to provide financial and technical assistance to the different parties involved in forest management [18].…”
Section: Assessing Institutional Performance In Managing Forest Resoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We understand by "institutional efficiency" the definition provided in[25]. The authors assume that institutional efficiency reflects a situation in which there is no feasible alternative for the state to create and enforce property and contract rights that everyone finds at least as good and which at least one of the economic actors strictly prefers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, (Hall and Jones, 1999;Olson et al, 1998;Bjørnskov and Foss, 2010;Chanda and Dalgaard, 2008) explained institution's influence in TFP growth through growth accounting approach. Weill, 2005, 2006;Adkins et al, 2002;Klein and Luu, 2003;Doucouliagos and Ulubasoglu, 2005;Dang, 2009) used SFA to measure the impact of institutions on technical efficiency level, whereas Lambsdorff (2003) used the similar approach to measure institutional impact on productivity. Institution productivity relationship was also being tested using DEA based nonparametric Malmquist productivity index approach (Baris Yoruk, 2007;Krüger, 2003;and M del Mar and Javier, 2007), while (M del Mar and Javier, 2011;Lall et al, 2002;Cherchye and Moesen, 2003) tested institutional impact on efficiency estimates calculated through DEA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%