2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-021-02145-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions and FDI from BRICS countries: a meta-analytic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that good governance includes several political and institutional conditions that could have a negative influence on the operation of an investment company (Fails 2012) or the business climate, and governance is considered to be the most unpredictable FDI factor (Busse and Hefeker 2009). Anwar and Iwasaki (2021) conducted a meta-analysis and reached the conclusion that foreign investors choose to invest their capitals in risky markets that present modest institutional quality. Several empirical studies have focused on the impact of the recipient country's governance on the amount of FDI inflows in different geographic regions in developed and developing countries, as presented in Table 1, as well as in different groups of developing economies (Table 2).…”
Section: Institutional Quality As An Fdi Determinant In Developing An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that good governance includes several political and institutional conditions that could have a negative influence on the operation of an investment company (Fails 2012) or the business climate, and governance is considered to be the most unpredictable FDI factor (Busse and Hefeker 2009). Anwar and Iwasaki (2021) conducted a meta-analysis and reached the conclusion that foreign investors choose to invest their capitals in risky markets that present modest institutional quality. Several empirical studies have focused on the impact of the recipient country's governance on the amount of FDI inflows in different geographic regions in developed and developing countries, as presented in Table 1, as well as in different groups of developing economies (Table 2).…”
Section: Institutional Quality As An Fdi Determinant In Developing An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good governance is key to inflows of FDI, existing literature has been postulating a positive connection between GG and FDI [ [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] ]. For instance, Anwar and Iwasaki [ 17 ] disclosed that foreign investors preferred a less risky environment for investment with robust involvement from institutions in the economy, positing a conducive investment ambiance that plays a beneficial role. Contrary, a lower degree of IQ in the economy posturized overall economic instability, disrespect of investor rights, and absence of good governance, which has a direct connection to investment risk and additional cost for securing the investment.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brazil, Russia, China, India and South Africa (BRICS) are outliers in the developing countries and are emerging faster with consistent return and good market depth (Mittal et al, 2022). The institutional quality positively impacts the cross-border M&A activity of BRICS countries (Anwar and Iwasaki, 2021). The relationships between the different types of investments are bound to differ for different economies due to differences in ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2022). The institutional quality positively impacts the cross-border M&A activity of BRICS countries (Anwar and Iwasaki, 2021). The relationships between the different types of investments are bound to differ for different economies due to differences in ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%