Institutions and Foreign Subsidiary Growth in Transition Economies: The Role of Intangible Assets and Capabilities

Abstract

Institutions and foreign subsidiary growth in transition economies:The role of intangible assets and capabilities ABSTRACTAlthough transition economies experience significant institutional transformations that vary in their degree and pace, scholarly knowledge of what distinguishes more successful foreign subsidiaries from less successful ones in such environments is limited and inconsistent. We enhance the understanding of this subject by examining how variations in the institutional development of transition economies influence the usefulness of a subsidiary's intangible assets and capabilities and, in turn, their effectiveness in enhancing its growth. Prior research assumes that foreign subsidiaries that operate in any given environment are always better off when they possess strong intangible assets and capabilities. Our analysis of more than 33,000 observations in 14 transition economies challenges this view and enables us to explain why some subsidiaries grow more quickly in less-developed institutional environments, whereas others more quickly in countries with institutions that are more developed. More specifically, we show that although a subsidiary's intangible assets enhance its growth in transition economies with stronger institutions, these effects are particularly weak or insignificant in transition countries with less developed institutional environments. Conversely, a completely different pattern emerges for subsidiary capabilities, with their marginal effects on subsidiary growth being significantly higher in countries that are institutionally less developed than in transition countries with more developed institutions.

Emerging-market firms’ dynamic capabilities and international performance: The moderating role of institutional development and distance

“…Better explanations can be made via a deeper understanding of institutions and DCs' interplay (cf. also Kafouros & Aliyev, 2016b;Krammer, Strange, & Lashitew, 2018;Teece, 2014;Watkins et al, 2015). Further, Wilden et al (2016) suggest that DCs literature would benefit from configuration theories.…”

“…Drawing on diverging arguments on the value and functioning of DCs across various institutional settings (Kafouros & Aliyev, 2016b), we argue that host-country institutional conditions exhibit multifaceted influences on the application and utilization of DCs. The critical issue concerning DCs is not whether they are universally effective, but whether they lead to a contextualized competitive difference based on their contingent configurations (Barreto, 2010;Wilden et al, 2016).…”

“…Given their institutional environments, mid-range emerging markets can be institutionally close to or distant from both institutionally developed and institutionally weak markets. Such institutional-proximity nuances could elicit contradictory influences from host-country institutions on the role of DCs (Kafouros & Aliyev, 2016b), which can yield paradoxical moderating influences of institutional development and distance on how EMFs' DCs translate into increased international performance.…”

How firm size moderates the knowledge and affects the innovation performance? Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms

“…There are alternatives to R&D investments that may promote firm performance, based on other intangibles assets (Carvalho et al, 2010;Kayo et al, 2006). Intangible assets have received large attention in the fields of business, management, accounting, and economics (Bontempi & Mairesse, 2015;Denicolai et al, 2015;Kayo et al, 2006;Kramer et al, 2011), once it contributes to the firm value creation (Carvalho et al, 2010;Kafouros & Aliyev, 2016;Kayo & Famá, 2004), such as brands, consumers' preference and their perception of the products or services (Bontempi & Mairesse, 2015;Carvalho et al, 2010;Frank et al, 2016).…”

International entrepreneurial capabilities: The role of networks in the small multinational enterprise

“…Increasingly it is the access to, creation and utilisation of intangible assets which provide the ability to achieve competitive advantage (Wills-Johnson 2008). Intangible resources include both assets and capability assets such as intellectual property, licences, knowledge, social capital and capabilities such as the ability to transform these assets into the desired outcomes (Kafouros and Aliyev 2016). The drive to learn from market experiences and act on the international opportunity of experienced individuals is difficult to imitate as well as replace.…”