2006
DOI: 10.1002/pad.423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions and governance: public staff management in Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional civil services systems have remain largely in place, and the central government has even continued to enforce this approach, sometimes through legislation (see Public Service Management and Employment Policy, 1999). This policy, although developed at a time when policy makers in Tanzania were already aware of the basics of NPM, has further centralised and placed the management of Civil Service in the hands of PO‐PSM (Bana and McCourt, 2006). The PO‐PSM (the Civil Service Department) has retained its power to formulate, review and evaluate human resources policies in the entire public service, leaving line ministries with very little freedom ( ibid ).…”
Section: Explaining the Autonomy And Control Of Agencies In Tanzaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The traditional civil services systems have remain largely in place, and the central government has even continued to enforce this approach, sometimes through legislation (see Public Service Management and Employment Policy, 1999). This policy, although developed at a time when policy makers in Tanzania were already aware of the basics of NPM, has further centralised and placed the management of Civil Service in the hands of PO‐PSM (Bana and McCourt, 2006). The PO‐PSM (the Civil Service Department) has retained its power to formulate, review and evaluate human resources policies in the entire public service, leaving line ministries with very little freedom ( ibid ).…”
Section: Explaining the Autonomy And Control Of Agencies In Tanzaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent Secretaries are reluctant to ‘let go’ parts of the ministries and deliberate efforts were made to retain both power and resources at the centre. In their recent work, Bana and McCourt (2006) note that as a result of socialism, the legal and constitutional framework in Tanzania conferred excessive power at the centre (in the president's office and in the ministries), and the recent reforms have not altered this governance arrangement. Agencification was supposed to be an ‘escape’ or a break away from a centralised management system, but for that to happen in Tanzania, public sector requires institutional and cultural change than a mere structural change.…”
Section: Explaining the Autonomy And Control Of Agencies In Tanzaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 More notably, ethnic, religious, and regional parties are barred. Multi-partyism is still not prevalent in practice (Bana and McCourt, 2006). Currently half of all councils have no opposition members and only three local governments have a non-CCM majority of local councilors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generally disappointing history of post-independence civil service reform (McCourt, 2001a) has left two legacies that are relevant to us. The first was de jure politicisation of the Public Service Commission (PSC) in 1972, when the Cabinet brought it under its control, an instance of a Third World trend of the time (Pinto, 1996;Bana and McCourt, 2006). Its ostensible aim was to break down the elitism of the civil service and harness it to national developmental objectives, but it resulted in the political capture of civil service appointments (De Silva, 1993b;ADB, 2004).…”
Section: The Sri Lanka Study: Patronage and The Failure Of Civil Servmentioning
confidence: 97%