2011
DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v1i2.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions as enablers of wellbeing: The Singapore Prison case study

Abstract: Abstract:Wellbeing research has long found a correlation between the subjective wellbeing of individuals and the quality of their private and public institutions. But which way do the causal arrows point, and what can be done to improve institutions? Only real-life experiments can answer these two questions convincingly.Prisons are frequently considered schools for criminals rather than creators of wellbeing. Thus they provide a tough test for institutional changes intended to improve wellbeing. Since 1998 the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, and potentially more importantly, these findings also offer novel opportunities for practical leadership interventions to improve employee health (for reviews see Day et al, 2006;Avolio, Reichard, Hannah, Walumbwa, & Chan, 2009;Taylor, Russ-Eft, & Taylor, 2009). These would also differ from more conventional well-being and stress reduction programs (e.g., those involving relaxation classes, massage therapy, gym classes), whose focus is on the individual rather than the broader social context that affect individuals' sense of self (Helliwell, 2011;Sani et al, 2012). More particularly, the present findings make the case for leadership interventions that help to create work environments which allow employees to embrace and live out group memberships at various levels of abstraction (e.g., the workgroup, de-partment, organisation as a whole) and which, rather than focussing on leaders or on followers alone, are conducted with leaders and followers together (Kellerman, 2012;Küpers & Weibler, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, and potentially more importantly, these findings also offer novel opportunities for practical leadership interventions to improve employee health (for reviews see Day et al, 2006;Avolio, Reichard, Hannah, Walumbwa, & Chan, 2009;Taylor, Russ-Eft, & Taylor, 2009). These would also differ from more conventional well-being and stress reduction programs (e.g., those involving relaxation classes, massage therapy, gym classes), whose focus is on the individual rather than the broader social context that affect individuals' sense of self (Helliwell, 2011;Sani et al, 2012). More particularly, the present findings make the case for leadership interventions that help to create work environments which allow employees to embrace and live out group memberships at various levels of abstraction (e.g., the workgroup, de-partment, organisation as a whole) and which, rather than focussing on leaders or on followers alone, are conducted with leaders and followers together (Kellerman, 2012;Küpers & Weibler, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fine example on the application of subjective wellbeing for institution and society is seen in the change that has occurred in the Singapore Prison Service (Helliwell, 2011). Inmates and prison staff gather, work, play and live resulting in improved well-being.…”
Section: Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To break the Einstellung effect sufficiently to convert ideas into practice may require experimental field trials of sufficient scale and realism as to force take-up of proven successes. 87 See Leong (2011) andHelliwell (2011). 88 These results are provided in more detail in Helliwell (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%