2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2280503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions as Game Theory Outcomes: Towards a Cognitive-Experimental Inquiry

Abstract: and Hurwicz (1973Hurwicz ( , 1975 focused on the role of social institutions and investigated their impact on economic processes. and Hayek' s (1962Hayek' s ( , 1967bHayek' s ( , 1988a

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, contrary to defining institutions as "incentives in human exchange, whether political, social, or economic" (North, 1990, p. 3), other economists have proposed to think of institutions not as rules but as outcomes of a game (Schotter, 1981;Voigt, 2013) or outcomes of social interaction (players' of the game interaction) (Ambrosino, 2013;Schotter, 1981). Schotter (1981) applies formal game theory models to analyse the emergence of institutions corresponding to Hayek's (1967) theories.…”
Section: Defining and Measuring Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, contrary to defining institutions as "incentives in human exchange, whether political, social, or economic" (North, 1990, p. 3), other economists have proposed to think of institutions not as rules but as outcomes of a game (Schotter, 1981;Voigt, 2013) or outcomes of social interaction (players' of the game interaction) (Ambrosino, 2013;Schotter, 1981). Schotter (1981) applies formal game theory models to analyse the emergence of institutions corresponding to Hayek's (1967) theories.…”
Section: Defining and Measuring Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has demonstrated the importance of learning processes in the emergence of norms and their social spread (Merlo and Schotter, ; Ambrosino and Lanteri, ). It has also shown the role of coordination processes in shaping institutional behaviour (Schelling, ; Ambrosino, ). More recently, the neuro‐economic approach has made contributions helpful for understanding mental processes and their representation (Kahneman and Frederick, ; Camerer et al ., ; Glimcher et al ., ).…”
Section: Institutional Cognitive Economics: a New Bridge Integrating mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has demonstrated the importance of learning processes in the emergence of norms and their social spread (Ambrosino and Lanteri, 2007; Merlo and Schotter, 1999). It has shown the importance and the complexity of coordination processes in shaping institutional behavior (Ambrosino, 2013; Schelling, 1960). More contributions are offered by the neuro-economic approach, that contributes in the understanding of mental processes and their representation (Camerer et al , 2005; Glimcher et al ., 2009; Kahneman and Frederick, 2002).…”
Section: Cognitive Economics Of Institutions and Its Connections Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this interconnection, CE of institutions shares the multiplicity of foci and avenues of inquiry of the OIE. Cognitive institutional economics adopts Hodgson's idea of a reconstructive downward causation process that links institutions and agents (Hodgson, 2003b), and it contributes to explaining this relationship (Ambrosino, 2006, 2012b, 2013).…”
Section: Cognitive Economics Of Institutions and Its Connections Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation