2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2011.00710.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions, Foreign Direct Investment and Growth: A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach

Abstract: We investigate empirically the existence of a heterogeneous relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and economic growth across developing countries.We argue that, across countries, differences in institutional quality are correlated with heterogeneous absorptive capacities and hence a heterogeneous FDI-growth relationship. Our empirical results show substantial heterogeneity in the FDI-growth relationship. We find that controlling for certain measures of institutional quality reduces the degree of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive impacts of FDI on host countries' economic growth depends on whether certain factors exist or not in those countries, such as the degree of openness of its economy, political stability, the absence of violence or domestic institutional quality (Asheghian 2004;Hansen and Rand 2006). Furthermore, in a recent empirical investigation, McCloud and Kumbhakar (2011) noted the existence of a heterogeneous relationship between FDI and economic growth across developing countries. They argued that, across countries, differences in institutional quality were correlated with heterogeneous absorptive capacities and hence, a heterogeneous FDI-growth relationship.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive impacts of FDI on host countries' economic growth depends on whether certain factors exist or not in those countries, such as the degree of openness of its economy, political stability, the absence of violence or domestic institutional quality (Asheghian 2004;Hansen and Rand 2006). Furthermore, in a recent empirical investigation, McCloud and Kumbhakar (2011) noted the existence of a heterogeneous relationship between FDI and economic growth across developing countries. They argued that, across countries, differences in institutional quality were correlated with heterogeneous absorptive capacities and hence, a heterogeneous FDI-growth relationship.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massive benefits are envisaged to be accrued to recipient nations of FDI with Goldberg and Klein (1998) asserting that FDI encourages export promotion, import substitution or greater trade in intermediate input which seldom exist between parent and affiliated producer. Other scholars believe there are positive links between FDI and economic growth and development (See Cipollina et al 2012, McCloud and Kumbhakar 2011, Wang and Wong 2008, Zhao and Du 2007, Liu et al 2014, Chaudhry et al 2013 and Adegbite and Ayadi 2010) but to the disagreement of Herzer (2012) who suggested that negative relationship exists between FDI and growth in developing countries (Akinlo 2004, Rehman 2016). Kiyota and Urata (2004) would reason that both investing and host countries do benefit from FDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…depicting corruption speaks volumes). R encompasses property rights, an important feature for economic growth (McCloud and Kumbhakar [35]). Country rankings based on corruption correspond inversely to country rankings based on property rights.…”
Section: Structures Of Cdrmentioning
confidence: 99%