2015
DOI: 10.1057/sth.2015.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutions of care, moral proximity and demoralisation: The case of the emergency department

Abstract: This article draws on concepts of morality and demoralisation to understand the problematic nature of relationships between staff and patients in public health services. The article uses data from a case study of a UK hospital Emergency Department to show how staff are tasked with the responsibility of treating and caring for patients, while at the same time their actions are shaped by the institutional concerns of accountability and resource management. The data extracts illustrate how such competing agendas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are similar to the experience of participants in related studies, such as the students in Dobrowolska and Palese's (2016) study who realized that they could not provide the care they idealized because of external constraints, such as a lack of time. Likewise, Hillman (2016) and Harvey, Thompson, Pearson, Willis, and Toffoli (2017) recognized that the culture of current health care organizations with their focus on accountability and resource management created problems of distance between health professionals and patients and the loss of the art of nursing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are similar to the experience of participants in related studies, such as the students in Dobrowolska and Palese's (2016) study who realized that they could not provide the care they idealized because of external constraints, such as a lack of time. Likewise, Hillman (2016) and Harvey, Thompson, Pearson, Willis, and Toffoli (2017) recognized that the culture of current health care organizations with their focus on accountability and resource management created problems of distance between health professionals and patients and the loss of the art of nursing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant structural factors include the tension between openness and emergency‐centeredness in walk‐in EMS organisations (Dodier and Camus ) – and how this is often resolved in favour of the latter, to the potential detriment of EPCCs and other EMS being open, low‐threshold institutions. Furthermore, Hillman () shows how antipathy can be linked to institutional concerns of rationalisation and efficiency, which engender a ‘combative’ relationship between EMS staff and patients. More – and preferably comparative – research is needed to flesh out the structural determinants of this ‘combative’ relationship.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staff notions of inappropriateness have been thoroughly investigated in sociological research, particularly in studies relating to informal patient categorisation in EMS settings (Dingwall and Murray , Dodier and Camus , Edwards and Sines , Edwards , Guttman et al . , Hillman , , , Hughes , , , , Jeffery , Kelly and May , Latimer , , Mannon , Roth , , Roth and Douglas , Vassy , Wamsiedel ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Relevant structural factors include the tension between openness and emergency-centeredness in walk-in EMS organisations and how this is often resolved in favour of the latter, to the potential detriment of EPCCs and other EMS being open, lowthreshold institutions. Furthermore, Hillman (2016) shows how antipathy can be linked to institutional concerns of rationalisation and efficiency, which engender a 'combative' relationship between EMS staff and patients. Moreand preferably comparativeresearch is needed to flesh out the structural determinants of this 'combative' relationship.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%