A comprehensive study was undertaken to investigate the "state of the art" in the training of school psychologists. The data indicate that the rate of growth in the number of programs is increasing, especially a t the sixth-year level. Data are presented on student and faculty demographics and characteristics. While evidence exists for the notion of program proliferation, the impact of such growth cannot be assessed without accurata data regarding present and future market demand.Periodic studies have attempted to assess the nature and extent of school psychology training in the United States. Five major studies were undertaken between 1965 and 1974 with the primary objective of identifying the number of institutions of higher education housing graduate school psychology training pro-). Inspection of the results of these studies reveals a relatively rapid increase in the number of programs identified during that ten-year period. Smith identified some 63 programs in 1964, while Bardon and Wenger reported 143 in 1974. Thus the number of programs had more than doubled during that period, with a mean of eight programs emerging per year. Such rapid expansion was, at once, both a sign of growth for the profession and a cause for concern. However, difficulties in data collection experienced by these investigators make the process of determining the significance of these studies somewhat difficult. Of particular concern to most authors was the percentage of programs responding in complete detail to surveys. In addition, varying numbers of programs responded with percentages ranging from 60 to approximately 88%.Perhaps the most complete study performed to date was that of Bardon and Wenger. Their research produced reasonably comprehensive information on the number of training institutions, the types of degrees conferred, the availability of financial assistance, and the primary departmental affiliation. Bardon and Wenger concluded that while their data were essentially accurate, they could not be considered definitive, since many programs did not respond completely to their survey. I n addition, concern about the program identification techniques employed was expressed.The present study was undertaken in order to provide essentially parametric data which could be utilized in performing trend analysis regarding training procedures. It was deemed essential by the investigators that the number of dimensions examined not be restricted in order to simplify data collection and analysis. Such restrictions were seen as a major weakness of previous studies. Information relating to the graduation rate of school psychologists at the national and state level was seen as especially critical. Such data bad not been collected in previous studies. Thus, no baseline had been established upon which to measure rate of growth in the 'This study was su ported jointly by the National Awociation of School Psychologists and the National Certification froject a t James Madison University. I t is part of an ongoing effort for the collection of inf...