2008
DOI: 10.1080/03634520801989950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional Communication Predictors of Ninth-Grade Students’ Affective Learning in Math and Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
63
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
63
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors influence the teacherÁstudent relationship (Richmond, Lane, & McCroskey, 2006) and students' affective learning (Burroughs, 2007;Mottet, Garza, Beebe, Houser, Jurrells, & Furler, 2008;Pogue & Ahyun, 2006), it seems plausible that teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors used in a writing conference may enhance the teacherÁstudent relationship and affective learning, regardless of the sensitivity of the feedback message. The closer the relationship between the teacher and student through the use of nonverbal immediacy behaviors, the more direct the teacher can be with feedback without worrying about the sensitivity of the feedback itself.…”
Section: Rationale For Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors influence the teacherÁstudent relationship (Richmond, Lane, & McCroskey, 2006) and students' affective learning (Burroughs, 2007;Mottet, Garza, Beebe, Houser, Jurrells, & Furler, 2008;Pogue & Ahyun, 2006), it seems plausible that teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors used in a writing conference may enhance the teacherÁstudent relationship and affective learning, regardless of the sensitivity of the feedback message. The closer the relationship between the teacher and student through the use of nonverbal immediacy behaviors, the more direct the teacher can be with feedback without worrying about the sensitivity of the feedback itself.…”
Section: Rationale For Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most pertinent to the current study, Mottet, Garza, Beebe, Houser and Jurrells et al (2008) found that teacher clarity and communication of content relevance were the strongest predictors of ninth graders' affective learning in math and science. A modified version of McCroskey's (1994) affective learning measure was used, which assessed students' intentions to take additional courses in these subject areas, as well as interest in pursuing careers in math-and science-related fields.…”
Section: Instructional Communication and Affective Learningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, while examining content relevance in this study and in the Webster et al (2011) study has helped to extend the PE literature related to affective learning, future research should pursue other communication variables that could further distinguish affective learning profiles in PE. For instance, instructional communication research has identified teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy (perceived physical and/or psychological closeness/approachability of the teacher) as two teacher communication variables that are linked to secondary students' affective learning in other subject areas (Mottet, et al, 2008;Plax, Kearney, McCroskey, & Richmond, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations