2013
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2013.792844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional design using an in-house built teaching assistant robot to enhance elementary school English-as-a-foreign-language learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This view highlights the influence of form on the affective filter (e.g., the experience of anxiety), and the role of cute and likeable agents in reducing it. It also emphasizes that chosen robots should appeal to the students [114]. There is some support for this view.…”
Section: Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This view highlights the influence of form on the affective filter (e.g., the experience of anxiety), and the role of cute and likeable agents in reducing it. It also emphasizes that chosen robots should appeal to the students [114]. There is some support for this view.…”
Section: Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots of all types can serve several purposes in language learning. They may be used to engage students as their conversational partner (e.g., References [63,66]), trigger vocabulary or grammar learning (e.g., References [20,27,66,99]), help with pronunciation [66,106], reading comprehension [42] or writing clarity [47], improve listening skills [42,50,66], assess language ability [31,95], increase positive affect or decrease anxiety [96,114], or serve as a conversational proxy or avatar for the student [70].…”
Section: Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, some researchers attempted to use robots to attract students' interest in elementary or junior high school. Most of these studies have treated robots as teachers' assistants and investigated whether learning outcomes were increased by the robot assistant (Alemi, Meghdari, & Ghazisaedy, ; Alemi, Meghdari, & Ghazisaedy, ; Chang, Lee, Po‐Yao, Chin‐Yeh, & Gwo‐Dong, ; Hong, Huang, Hsu, & Shen, ; Hung, Chao, Lee, & Chen, ; In & Han, ; Wu, Wang, & Chen, ; You, Shen, Chang, Liu, & Chen, ). Here, we describe studies that assessed students' learning outcomes using a pretest and posttest.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%