2022
DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2022.2088443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional effects on L2 pragmatic comprehension: the case of indirect refusals and indirect opinions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, they relied strongly on keyword inferencing (32.5%), visual cues (22.9%), and process of elimination (16.9%), all three of which were referenced when participants admitted to not understanding any or much of the target utterance. In such cases, learners relied on these strategies to essentially guess the answer, a phenomenon that was also observed in Nguyen and Pham (2022), Taguchi (2002, 2009a), and Yamanaka (2003. It may then be more appropriate to talk about compensatory strategies rather than inferencing strategies in these cases.…”
Section: Meaning Category Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, they relied strongly on keyword inferencing (32.5%), visual cues (22.9%), and process of elimination (16.9%), all three of which were referenced when participants admitted to not understanding any or much of the target utterance. In such cases, learners relied on these strategies to essentially guess the answer, a phenomenon that was also observed in Nguyen and Pham (2022), Taguchi (2002, 2009a), and Yamanaka (2003. It may then be more appropriate to talk about compensatory strategies rather than inferencing strategies in these cases.…”
Section: Meaning Category Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We suggest that similarities between L1 and L2 conventions may have facilitated comprehension in our study. Indeed previous research (Ellis et al, 2021; Kim & Lantolf, 2016; Nguyen & Pham, 2022; Taguchi, 2002; Taguchi & Yamaguchi, 2019) shows that when culture‐specific conventions are not shared between L1 and L2, explicit instruction is often necessary for learners to develop the pragmatic skills needed to comprehend indirect meaning. In the case of our study, any time our interview participants were able to understand the literal meaning of the target utterance, they were able to reach the correct intended interpretation of the indirect meaning, often through logical reasoning or background knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By investigating the experiences of English as a Second Language (ESL) students, the purpose of this research is to offer valuable insights into the applicability and impact of Immersive Reader technology in educational settings that are based in the real world (Thuy et al, 2022). With these findings, educators and policymakers will have access to facts regarding the efficacy of such devices in language learning, and they will also contribute to the larger conversation about learning through the use of technology.…”
Section: Spry Contemporary Educational Practices Published By Spry Pu...mentioning
confidence: 99%