2018
DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional Supports for Representational Fluency in Solving Linear Equations with Computer Algebra Systems and Paper‐and‐Pencil

Abstract: This research addresses the issue of how to support students' representational fluency-the ability to create, move within, translate across, and derive meaning from external representations of mathematical ideas. The context of solving linear equations in a combined computer algebra system (CAS) and paper-and-pencil classroom environment is targeted as a rich and pressing context to study this issue. We report results of a collaborative teaching experiment in which we designed for and tested a functions approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether 11 studies (3.5%) belong to the category "technology". These studies either use technology that comprises sequenced OTL and thus match the definition of CRs used in this paper, or they investigate issues related to the integration of technology into a curriculum or matters of coordination of different resources including technology and CRs (e.g., Clark-Wilson & Hoyles, 2019;Fonger, 2018). In the latter case, the technology itself is not a CR but an amendment to CRs.…”
Section: Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether 11 studies (3.5%) belong to the category "technology". These studies either use technology that comprises sequenced OTL and thus match the definition of CRs used in this paper, or they investigate issues related to the integration of technology into a curriculum or matters of coordination of different resources including technology and CRs (e.g., Clark-Wilson & Hoyles, 2019;Fonger, 2018). In the latter case, the technology itself is not a CR but an amendment to CRs.…”
Section: Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students also lack to relate and translate the representation with the underline mathematical concept (Samsuddin & Retnawati, 2018). Fonger, Davis, and Rohwer (2018) in turn, reported that instructional support enabled student to enhance RF. Students have a huge gap in flexible implementation of MRs during problem solving and bridging them through translation .…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%