a unique opportunity for this. Discussing with specialists real patient cases, examinations and treatments already carried out also serves as quality control of the work done in the health centre. Conclusions Telemedicine does not reduce the duty of care owed to patients by health-care professionals. According to the World Medical Association (WMA) statement on responsibilities in the practice of telemedicine, the physician asking for another physician's advice remains responsible for the care given to the patient 5. This emphasizes the role of primary care but requires that the attending GP is sufficiently well educated to be able to exercise proper clinical judgement and to conduct a proper physical examination. Videoconferencing between a health centre and a hospital without the participation of a GP may be regarded as questionable, especially at the first visit. It saves the GP's working time but loses many of the benefits referred to earlier. In addition to this, the WMA statement emphasizes the need for an existing professional relationship with a patient before a direct telemedicine consultation can be arranged. Telemedicine can play an important role at the interface between primary and secondary care. It can help to make the process of collaboration more fluent, serviceable and cost-saving 6. It promotes the decentralization of healthcare delivery 3,6 and leads to a more versatile supply of services in primary care 6. This is in line with the health-care strategies of many European countries, where advanced technologies are used, as far as possible, to deliver a higher proportion of care in the community. Although widespread use of telemedicine permits decentralization 6 , this does not mean fragmentation of health-care. On the contrary, it promotes the functional integration of health-care organizations and thereby helps them to achieve seamless service delivery for the benefit of the population.