2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11125-004-5310-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructional Time and National Achievement: Cross-National Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
48
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of PISA 2009 results showed that a moderate amount of time in regular lessons had the most positive association with performance (OECD, 2011). Baker, Fabrega and Galindo (2004) analysed cross-sectional international data to compare the relationship between instruction time and student performance (as measured in OECD's PISA and IEA's TIMSS) in almost 40 countries and found no significant relationship. Instruction time in mathematics explained 2.2% of variance in mathematics performance and in most countries there was no relationship, even after accounting for differences in students' home educational resources.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Marginal Changes In the Amount Of Allocatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of PISA 2009 results showed that a moderate amount of time in regular lessons had the most positive association with performance (OECD, 2011). Baker, Fabrega and Galindo (2004) analysed cross-sectional international data to compare the relationship between instruction time and student performance (as measured in OECD's PISA and IEA's TIMSS) in almost 40 countries and found no significant relationship. Instruction time in mathematics explained 2.2% of variance in mathematics performance and in most countries there was no relationship, even after accounting for differences in students' home educational resources.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Marginal Changes In the Amount Of Allocatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has examined a broad range of aspects of teaching that may lead to this success, ranging from the relatively large amount of time spent on academic activities during and after school hours [3,4] "What the numbers say," 1998), to teaching practices such as whole group instruction with limited rote drills and an emphasis on self-discipline [5][6][7][8]. Interestingly, however, observations of classrooms in high performing countries found that no single teaching practice was common across all of the countries (National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES), 2003), suggesting that factors other than practices may be behind this success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, holding lower expectations on TVE for some students can perpetuate lower academic performance and inhibit students' success. Thus, the duration of training of TVE programmes, combined with the lower formal qualifications typically required by Ministries of Higher Education, (Baker, Fabrega, Galindo, & Mishook, 2004) as compared to other academic subject perpetuates the low status students place on TVE. Students do not take TVE seriously and they label such students as low achievers and as a result, students shun TVE in universities (Kolbe, Partridge & O'Reilly, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%