Instructor Pilot's Role in Simulator Training.  Phase III.

Charles, John P.

doi:10.21236/ada061732

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar problems have been noted in studies of lOS and instructional feature designs by Charles, Willard, andHealey (1976), andIsley andMiller (1976). Mackie et al (1972), reported that such lOS design deficiencies created problem set-up and performance measurement difficulties that adversely affect the acceptability of devices so far as instructors are concerned.…”

Section: Os Designsupporting

confidence: 68%

Aircrew Training Devices: Utilization.

Paul¹,

Shelnutt²,

Spears³

1981

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Os Designsupporting

confidence: 68%

Aircrew Training Devices: Utilization.

Paul¹,

Shelnutt²,

Spears³

1981

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Automated adaptive training received the lowest utility and utilization ratings of the training management features; however, it is difficult to draw any firm conclusions since the feature was operational on only one ATD, the F-4E/F-4G. Notwithstanding the low ratings, there is considerable evidence that automated adaptive training has training utility (Brown, Waag, & Eddowes, 1975;Charles, Johnson, & Swink, 1971Charles, Willard, & Healey, 1975;Feuge, Charles, & Miller, 1973). According to Brown et al (1975), the major difficulties with automated adaptive training are limited training scenarios, the high cost of software implementation, the lack of formal instructor training in the use of the feature, and the lack of training directives to implement such training.…”

Section: Training Management Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aircrew training devices: Utility and utilization of advanced instructional features: Phase IV: Summary report.

Polzella¹

1987

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern aircrew training devices (ATDs) are equipped with sophisticated hardware and software capabilities, known as advanced instructional features (AIFs), that permit a simulator instructor to prepare briefings, manage training, vary task difficulty/fidelity, monitor performande, and provide feedback for flight simulation training missions. The utility and use of the AIF capabilities of Air Force ATDs were explored by means of a survey of 534 simulator instructors from Air Training Command, Military Airlift Command, Strategic Air Command, and Tactical Air Command training sites. The primary purpose of the survey was to provide a database that could be used in defining the requirements for ATD procurement and in developing future ATD training programs. The results indicated that, in general, the features that were rated highest were those used for training management, variation of task difficulty/fidelity, and monitoring student performance. The level of AIF use was affected somewhat by hardware and/or software unreliability, implementation time, functional limitations, and design deficiencies. However, the presumed training value of an AIF was the most important determinant of its use. Recommendations were made concerning the AIF capabilities of future ATDS and research aimed at determining the principles of effective AIF use. The survey instruments are appended.

show abstract

Instructor Pilot's Role in Simulator Training. Phase III.

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Aircrew Training Devices: Utilization.

Aircrew Training Devices: Utilization.

Aircrew training devices: Utility and utilization of advanced instructional features: Phase IV: Summary report.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About