2016
DOI: 10.1177/0098628316662766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instructors’ Use of Trigger Warnings and Behavior Warnings in Abnormal Psychology

Abstract: College students have been increasingly demanding warnings and accommodations in relation to course topics they believe will elicit strong, negative emotions. These “trigger warnings” are highly relevant to Abnormal Psychology because of the sensitive topics covered in the course (e.g., suicide, trauma, sex). A survey of Abnormal Psychology instructors ( N = 131) indicated that the majority of them regularly warned students to avoid course-specific behaviors such as stigmatizing mental illness, diagnosing peop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
31
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it appears that both instructor and student attitudes towards trigger warnings are mixed [11][12][13][14]. For example, when asked whether they supported the use of trigger warnings in their training, medical students were evenly split among the options [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it appears that both instructor and student attitudes towards trigger warnings are mixed [11][12][13][14]. For example, when asked whether they supported the use of trigger warnings in their training, medical students were evenly split among the options [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprising given that the importance of trigger warnings 1 has been emphasized in strategies for teaching about sexual assault in the classroom (e.g., Branch, Hayes-Smith, & Richards, 2011; Byron, 2017; Carter, 2015; cf. Boysen, Wells, & Dawson, 2016). Without a clear understanding of student responses to campus education that acknowledges survivors’ and those who know survivors’ experiences, we are unable to establish empirically driven programs that could contribute to very real changes on college campuses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…İntihar, yeme bozukluğu, cinsel taciz gibi bir dizi tetikleyici olabileceği öne sürülen unsuru ders konusu olarak içeren Anormal Davranışlar dersini veren öğretim üyeleri üzerinde yapılan bir çalışmada ise öğretim üyelerinin travma sonrası stres bozukluğu semptomlarını tetikleyebilecek içeriklerle ilgili öğrencileri uyarma gereği duymadıklarını ve çoğunlukla tetikleyici uyarıları konusunda nötr ya da negatif bir tutuma sahip oldukları bulgulanmıştır (Boysen, Wells, Dawson, 2016).…”
Section: Tetikleyici Uyarılarının Kullanım Sıklığıunclassified