2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00771.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrument‐ and protocol‐dependent variation in the enumeration of CD34+ cells by flow cytometry

Abstract: Both interinstrument and interprotocol variation can provide additional explanation for the redundantly reported discrepancies concerning the numbers of CD34 cells that suffice to secure hemopoietic grafting. These results point to the need for new and different standardization approaches in this clinically relevant field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previously published studies, 26,27 we observed a significant correlation prefreeze/post-thaw by the use of a single cytometry platform for the quality control step. As suggested in preliminary studies about CD34 þ cell measurement 19,20 and CB thawing, 28 our results confirm, under transplantation conditions, that standardization of CD34 þ cell numeration techniques and use of single platform cytometry are necessary to better estimate the CD34 þ cell influence in CB transplantation. Concerning TNC counts, frozen and infused TNC doses also correlated, as well as TNC and CD34 þ cell doses either before freezing and after thawing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to previously published studies, 26,27 we observed a significant correlation prefreeze/post-thaw by the use of a single cytometry platform for the quality control step. As suggested in preliminary studies about CD34 þ cell measurement 19,20 and CB thawing, 28 our results confirm, under transplantation conditions, that standardization of CD34 þ cell numeration techniques and use of single platform cytometry are necessary to better estimate the CD34 þ cell influence in CB transplantation. Concerning TNC counts, frozen and infused TNC doses also correlated, as well as TNC and CD34 þ cell doses either before freezing and after thawing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is important to assess to what extent the variability in cell numeration techniques utilized by CB banks and transplant centres may affect the evaluation of cell loss. Two recent studies reported an important inter-laboratory variability of CD34 þ cell counts measured by flow cytometry, 19,20 which could be attributed to the staining method 19 or to the instrument settings. 20 These technical issues do not affect the intrinsic quality of the CB graft, but can ultimately influence the decision of clinical investigators to select a CB unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all patients, laboratory workup and clinical studies were performed daily. Enumeration of the total white mononuclear cells and CD34+ cells was done by flow cytometry [8] The apheresis products obtained on days -3, -2 and -1 were kept in a conventional blood bank refrigerator and re-infused to the patients on days 0, +1 and +2, respectively [9] .…”
Section: Stem Cell Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even when using a single-platform method to numerate CD34+ cells in cord blood cellular products, a relatively high variability persists (Moroff et al, 2006;Rivadeneyra-Espinoza et al, 2006). These variations could be related to technical variability between cytometers or to biological variability between different reagents.…”
Section: Standardization Of Cd34 Evaluation Through Comparison Of Promentioning
confidence: 99%