2005
DOI: 10.1080/14639220500078179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
42

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
73
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…a procedure, a graph)-and of a way of doing things, a human dimension related to how the tool is used and for which purpose. It is this association between the tool and the human dimension that constitutes the instrument (for a detailed conceptual discussion, see in particular Rabardel and Béguin [21]). In accordance with this theory, the analysis of transitions can benefit from identifying the new artifacts used by farmers.…”
Section: The Professional World As a Prism To Analyze Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a procedure, a graph)-and of a way of doing things, a human dimension related to how the tool is used and for which purpose. It is this association between the tool and the human dimension that constitutes the instrument (for a detailed conceptual discussion, see in particular Rabardel and Béguin [21]). In accordance with this theory, the analysis of transitions can benefit from identifying the new artifacts used by farmers.…”
Section: The Professional World As a Prism To Analyze Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They explore the processes of enacting by observing the details of interaction and tracking processes of group practices. The second study builds on Rabardel's notion of instrumental genesis (Lonchamp 2012b;Rabardel and Beguin 2005;Ritella and Hakkarainen 2012) by developing an analysis of the dialectic of resistance and accommodation driving the enactment of designed artifacts by users. There are also striking contrasts between the two studies, notably in the very different level of maturity of the students and the span of time given for their interactions.…”
Section: Bringing Artifacts Into Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discipline has offered theoretically and methodically significant results that allow understanding the tools in question from a more holistic perspective (Arvola, 2010;Bødker, 2006;Kuutti & Bannon, 2014). Drawing on activity theory, Rabardel and Beguin (2005) provided an important theoretical account on the mutual interaction on the development of activity and the role of tools. However, even further theoretical attention to determining the generic role of tools in activity is still needed for developing a firm foundation on which to develop understanding of what is a "good" tool.…”
Section: Operationalising the Role Of Tools In Actingmentioning
confidence: 99%