Based on research that regionally contextualizes millions of data points and hundreds of sites, we have previously argued that the Salado phenomenon was a social movement aimed at returning power to all community members in the Hohokam world and led to what archaeologists have problematically called the “Hohokam Collapse.” In this chapter, we explain why terms like collapse indicate an underlying bias and fail to capture intentionality and the achieved positive outcomes of social and political decentralization and why current archaeological explanations may be useful for explaining local changes, but are inadequate for explaining the dramatic transition in cultural practices at the end of the Classic Period for the Hohokam world at large. Finally, we discuss how this new understanding of Salado as a social movement is supported by published Akimel and Tohono O’Odham oral histories.