2022
DOI: 10.1002/oca.2941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumental variable‐based multi‐innovation gradient estimation for nonlinear systems with scarce measurements

Abstract: Summary This article considers the identification problems of nonlinear systems with scarce measurements by using the instrumental variable technique. When the product of the instrumental matrix and the information matrix is a nonsingular matrix and the weak persistent excitation condition about the instrumental vector is true, the obtained parameter estimates can be unbiased consistent estimates. The key is how to choose the instrumental variables. Difficulty arises in that the system outputs are unavailable.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the parameter estimation errors of the ML-IV-RLS algorithm are shown in Figure 1 with 𝜎 2 = 0.05 2 , n * s = 1 and n * s = 2, respectively. Secondly, the parameter estimation errors of the ML-IV-RLS algorithm and the IV-RLS algorithm are shown in Figure 2 with 𝜎 2 = 0.05 2 .…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, the parameter estimation errors of the ML-IV-RLS algorithm are shown in Figure 1 with 𝜎 2 = 0.05 2 , n * s = 1 and n * s = 2, respectively. Secondly, the parameter estimation errors of the ML-IV-RLS algorithm and the IV-RLS algorithm are shown in Figure 2 with 𝜎 2 = 0.05 2 .…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, applying the ML-IV-RLS algorithm in ( 9)-( 20) and the IV-RLS algorithm to estimate the example system, the parameter estimates and their errors 𝛿 ∶= || θ(n s ) − 𝜽||∕||𝜽|| are shown in Tables 1-3 with 𝜎 2 = 0.05 2 and 𝜎 2 = 0.11 2 , respectively, and their parameter tracking curves s are shown in Figures 3 and 4. The ML-IV-RLS algorithm prediction values versus n s are shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations