Biomagnetism 1981
DOI: 10.1515/9783110863529-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentation For Biomedical Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of the SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) (14) with its ability to detect magnetic fields of picotesla strength has given rise to a greatly extended interest in the measurement of magnetic fields of biological origin. The question as to whether such measurements contribute anything basically new relative to their electrical potential counterparts continues as a controversial question since first considered with respect to fields of cardiac origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of the SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device) (14) with its ability to detect magnetic fields of picotesla strength has given rise to a greatly extended interest in the measurement of magnetic fields of biological origin. The question as to whether such measurements contribute anything basically new relative to their electrical potential counterparts continues as a controversial question since first considered with respect to fields of cardiac origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 are integrated over a volume containing all sources and if the divergence theorem is applied to the left-hand side then this integral must go to zero because J' is zero at the bounding surface. Consequently I r dI fr dv=-fJ7'.V(1/r)dV (14) and Eq. 12 can also be written (15) Eq.…”
Section: E=-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noise (referred to the input) was 30 µV Hz −1/2 at 1 Hz. For most routine heart diagnostics this is sufficient, providing, as it does, a 30:1 signal-to-noise ratio for peak heart signals [5] (around 1 mV). However, the electrical potentials generated by the body can vary widely [5,6], with the generally accepted minimum (≈10 µV) arising from foetal heart action [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most routine heart diagnostics this is sufficient, providing, as it does, a 30:1 signal-to-noise ratio for peak heart signals [5] (around 1 mV). However, the electrical potentials generated by the body can vary widely [5,6], with the generally accepted minimum (≈10 µV) arising from foetal heart action [5]. Hence, there is a clear need for a non-contact sensor with a noise level close to 1 µV Hz −1/2 at 1 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%