2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentation for status monitoring and protection of SST-1 superconducting magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under cryogenic temperatures and magnetic elds, the strain measurements of superconducting magnets are generally performed using half-active or full-active bridge con gurations, which have been described in detail in previous studies [14][15][16][17][18][19]. A half-active bridge compensation con guration can theoretically eliminate measurement errors that occur due to a large temperature gradient and magnetoresistance effect by an equal and opposite gauge response.…”
Section: Technique Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Under cryogenic temperatures and magnetic elds, the strain measurements of superconducting magnets are generally performed using half-active or full-active bridge con gurations, which have been described in detail in previous studies [14][15][16][17][18][19]. A half-active bridge compensation con guration can theoretically eliminate measurement errors that occur due to a large temperature gradient and magnetoresistance effect by an equal and opposite gauge response.…”
Section: Technique Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, monitoring simultaneous mechanical strain under extreme cryogenic multi eld conditions is both necessary and challenging. In such scenarios, strain is typically measured using low-temperature resistance strain gauges with temperatures ranging from room temperature (RT, ~293 K) to that of liquid helium (LHe, ~4.2 K) in several superconducting instruments [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, cryogenics always causes a great drift thermal offset to the measurement, and the magnetic eld around the strain gauge can easily result in a magneto-resistance error [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations