1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02513307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation

Abstract: There is described a 60-channel EEG acquisition system designed for the recording of scalp-potential distributions starting just 2.5 ms after individual transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses. The amplifier comprises gain-control and sample-and-hold circuits to prevent large artefacts from magnetically induced voltages in the leads. The maximum amplitude of the stimulus artefact during the 2.5 ms gating period is 1.7 microV, and 5 ms after the TMS pulse it is only 0.9 microV. It is also shown that mech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
182
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
182
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to imaging of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals, which are inevitably slow because of their dependence on hemodynamics, we here measured neuronal activity directly as voltage changes across neuronal membranes. Commonly, immediate detection of the fluctuations in neuronal membrane potentials suffers from artifacts introduced by the TMS coil discharge, leading to overload of recording amplifiers around the time point of TMS pulses (22,36) and masking of neuronal effects, which can gradually be reduced by only advanced technologies (50)(51)(52)(53). Obviously, VSD imaging does not provide single-cell resolution and is limited to cortical surface areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to imaging of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals, which are inevitably slow because of their dependence on hemodynamics, we here measured neuronal activity directly as voltage changes across neuronal membranes. Commonly, immediate detection of the fluctuations in neuronal membrane potentials suffers from artifacts introduced by the TMS coil discharge, leading to overload of recording amplifiers around the time point of TMS pulses (22,36) and masking of neuronal effects, which can gradually be reduced by only advanced technologies (50)(51)(52)(53). Obviously, VSD imaging does not provide single-cell resolution and is limited to cortical surface areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During TMS pulses, the amplifier was gated by sample-and-hold circuit for 2 msec to remove most of the TMS-induced artifact. 39 …”
Section: Eeg Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these early attempts were not replicated immediately, probably because of the various technical limitations. Indeed, voltage changes induced by the TMS pulse between scalp electrodes are six orders of magnitude larger than microvolt-level EEG signals [42]. Such high voltage levels can lead to the saturation of a standard EEG amplifier, which can last for hundreds of milliseconds.…”
Section: Tms-eeg Coregistrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the development of new technologies and solutions has gradually led to an improvement of the temporal resolution of EEG recording during TMS. Such strategies can be divided in two types: on-line strategies, which consists of the creation of technologies that are able to avoid saturating the EEG amplifiers during TMS (e.g., [42]) and off-line strategies, which aim to remove artefacts once the coregistration is completed (e.g., [44,68]). …”
Section: Technical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation