2011
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instruments for analysing the influence of advertising on children's food choices

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this report was to present methodological aspects of assessing the effects of advertising on children's food choices and preferences. Methods: Two instruments have been used: first, a choice experiment on children's food knowledge and preferences, and second, a questionnaire on children's knowledge about and attitudes towards advertising. The choice experiment employed 10 matched pairs of food items, each represented in two magazines, one that tested knowledge and the other food preferenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Four modules that are typically not applied in population-based studies of small children (blood measures, accelerometry, fitness and bone stiffness) are described below. For further details on these and other examination modules, see Suling et al 15 and Stomfai et al 20 Blood measures.…”
Section: Measurements and Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Four modules that are typically not applied in population-based studies of small children (blood measures, accelerometry, fitness and bone stiffness) are described below. For further details on these and other examination modules, see Suling et al 15 and Stomfai et al 20 Blood measures.…”
Section: Measurements and Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section F, for each food pair, the children were required to record which food type that they preferred and for Section G, the children were required to record which food type that they believed to be healthier. Even though the items were adapted Gwozdz and Reisch (Gwozdz and Reisch, 2011), some of the foods were modified or added to suit the local situation as recommended by the local experts. The 10 matched food pairs (in order of sequence) were sugar-free breakfast cereals versus sugared breakfast cereals, white rice versus fried rice (local food added), snack foods versus biscuits (local food added), carbonated drinks (modified from 'Coke') versus plain water, noodles prepared at home (modified from 'pasta') versus instant noodles (modified form 'pot noodles'), fried chicken (modified from 'beef burger') versus chicken soup (modified from 'roast beef'), fruit yoghurt (modified from 'strawberry yoghurt') versus fruit cake (modified from 'strawberry cake'), wholemeal bread and white bread, fried potatoes (French fries) versus boiled potatoes (modified from potato) and fruits (modified from 'orange') versus fruit-flavoured ice-cream or ice confection (modified from 'orange ice'.…”
Section: Television Food Advertising Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other areas, which were purchasing and purchase-related behaviour and diet and health status, were not covered in this questionnaire. Items for knowledge on television food advertising (section E) were adapted from Jolls (Jolls, 2011), whereas items for knowledge on healthier food (section F) and preference for healthier food (section G) were adapted from Gwozdz and Reisch (Gwozdz and Reisch, 2011). Items for Consumption of Commonly Advertised Foods (section H) were adapted from Stansfeld et al (Stansfeld et al, 2003).…”
Section: Television Food Advertising Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This supplement contains many studies carried out to ensure the quality and rigour of measures included in the IDEFICS study. This measurement rigour has been applied to diet 8,9 and physical activity, [10][11][12] as well as to measurement of social and biological determinants [13][14][15] and health consequences. [16][17][18][19][20] Furthermore, the detailed description of both the strengths and limitations with regard to measurement selection and development is an important resource for dissemination, given its potential for shaping future studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%