2001
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2675(20010228)84:2<296::aid-hlca296>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulated Molecular Wires: Dendritic Encapsulation of Poly(triacetylene) Oligomers, Attempted Dendritic Stabilization of Novel Poly(pentaacetylene) Oligomers, and an Organometallic Approach to Dendritic Rods

Abstract: Dendrons 8, 13, and 17 were subsequently attached to (E)-2,3-bis[(triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl]but-2-ene-1,4-diol (18) [4] [21] using the Mitsunobu reaction [22] to give the dendritic silyl-protected monomers 19 ± 21, respectively (Scheme 2). The yield of the third-generation compound 21 was very low (4%), possibly due to steric hindrance of the reacting COOH group by the bulky dendritic wedges in dendron 17. After deprotection with Bu 4 NF in wet THF, the free (E)-enediynes 22 ± 24 were obtained. The dendritic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( Schaefer et al 1992 ), P(OPh) 3 ( Sabounchei and Naghipour 2001 ), P(benzyl) 3 ( Johansson et al 2002 ), P(2-cyanoethyl) 3 ( Khan et al 1993 ), P(NMe 2 ) 3 ( Xi et al 1990 ), P { (MeNCH 2 CH 2 ) 3 N } ( Xi et al 1990 ), P(H) (Bu t ) 2 ( Giannandrea et al 2000 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (cy-C 3 H 5 ) ( Simms et al 1987 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (Pr i ) ( Di Meglio et al 1992 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (Ph) ( Di Meglio et al 1990 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (CH 2 -cy-C 4 H 7 ) ( Simms and Ibers 1987 ), P { (CH 2 C)(CF 3 ) 2 . (OH) } (Ph) 2 ( Montgomery et al 1987 ), P { (F 2 C)(CF 3 ) } (Ph) 2 (at 293 and 173 K; Palcic et al 2004 ), P(benzyl)(Ph) 2 ( Muller 2012b ), P { C 6 H 4 NMe 2 -4 } (cyhexyl) 2 ( Davis and Meijboom 2012 ), P(FC = CF 2 H)(cy-hexyl) 2 ( Barnes et al 2008 ), P(ClC = CF 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Barnes et al 2001 ), P { (CH 2 ) 2 (CF 2 ) 5 (CF 3 ) } 3 ( Stibrany and Gorun 1999 ), P { C 6 H 4 (Pr i )-4 } (cy-hexyl) 2 ( Vuba and Muller 2012 ), P { C 6 H 4 (CH = CH 2 )-4 } (Ph) 2 ( Ogutu and Meijboom 2011 ), P { C 6 H 4 (CF 3 )-2 } (Ph) 2 ( Croxtall et al 2002 ), P { (C 6 H 4 ((CF 2 ) 5 (CF 3 )-2) } (Ph) 2 ( Croxtall et al 2002 ), P(HNNC 5 H 10 )(Pr i ) 2 ( Clarke et al 2003 ), P(C 23 H 21 N 2 O)(Ph) 2 ( Hursthouse et al 2003a ), P(B 10 C 4 H 11 ) (Ph) 2 ( Spokoyny et al 2012 ), P(C 6 H 5 O 2 S)(Ph) 2 ( Velauthamurty et al 2009 ), P(C 7 H 9 )(Ph) 2 ( Massard et al 2012 ( Nagata et al 2003, Tokitoh et al 2004, P(C 21 H 19 O 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Schenning et al 2001 ), P(C 16 H 25 O 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Reznicek et al 2012 ), P(C 8 H 5 S 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Stott et al 2007 ), P(C 12 H 7 S 3 )(Ph) 2 ( Stott et al 2007 ), P { C 6 H 4 P(O)(OEt) 2 } (Ph) 2 ( Ellis et al 2000 ), P(C...…”
Section: Structural Aspects Of Ptp 2 CL 2 Derivativessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…, P(C 6 F 5 ) 3 ( Schaefer et al 1992 ), P(OPh) 3 ( Sabounchei and Naghipour 2001 ), P(benzyl) 3 ( Johansson et al 2002 ), P(2-cyanoethyl) 3 ( Khan et al 1993 ), P(NMe 2 ) 3 ( Xi et al 1990 ), P { (MeNCH 2 CH 2 ) 3 N } ( Xi et al 1990 ), P(H) (Bu t ) 2 ( Giannandrea et al 2000 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (cy-C 3 H 5 ) ( Simms et al 1987 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (Pr i ) ( Di Meglio et al 1992 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (Ph) ( Di Meglio et al 1990 ), P(Bu t ) 2 (CH 2 -cy-C 4 H 7 ) ( Simms and Ibers 1987 ), P { (CH 2 C)(CF 3 ) 2 . (OH) } (Ph) 2 ( Montgomery et al 1987 ), P { (F 2 C)(CF 3 ) } (Ph) 2 (at 293 and 173 K; Palcic et al 2004 ), P(benzyl)(Ph) 2 ( Muller 2012b ), P { C 6 H 4 NMe 2 -4 } (cyhexyl) 2 ( Davis and Meijboom 2012 ), P(FC = CF 2 H)(cy-hexyl) 2 ( Barnes et al 2008 ), P(ClC = CF 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Barnes et al 2001 ), P { (CH 2 ) 2 (CF 2 ) 5 (CF 3 ) } 3 ( Stibrany and Gorun 1999 ), P { C 6 H 4 (Pr i )-4 } (cy-hexyl) 2 ( Vuba and Muller 2012 ), P { C 6 H 4 (CH = CH 2 )-4 } (Ph) 2 ( Ogutu and Meijboom 2011 ), P { C 6 H 4 (CF 3 )-2 } (Ph) 2 ( Croxtall et al 2002 ), P { (C 6 H 4 ((CF 2 ) 5 (CF 3 )-2) } (Ph) 2 ( Croxtall et al 2002 ), P(HNNC 5 H 10 )(Pr i ) 2 ( Clarke et al 2003 ), P(C 23 H 21 N 2 O)(Ph) 2 ( Hursthouse et al 2003a ), P(B 10 C 4 H 11 ) (Ph) 2 ( Spokoyny et al 2012 ), P(C 6 H 5 O 2 S)(Ph) 2 ( Velauthamurty et al 2009 ), P(C 7 H 9 )(Ph) 2 ( Massard et al 2012 ( Nagata et al 2003, Tokitoh et al 2004, P(C 21 H 19 O 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Schenning et al 2001 ), P(C 16 H 25 O 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Reznicek et al 2012 ), P(C 8 H 5 S 2 )(Ph) 2 ( Stott et al 2007 ), P(C 12 H 7 S 3 )(Ph) 2 ( Stott et al 2007 ), P { C 6 H 4 P(O)(OEt) 2 } (Ph) 2 ( Ellis et al 2000 ), P(C...…”
Section: Structural Aspects Of Ptp 2 CL 2 Derivativessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Continuing our studies on the dependence of photophysical properties of strongly conjugated hydroporphyrin dyads on the linking moiety, we intended to prepare a series of arrays where chlorins and bacteriochlorins are connected by a linker comprising alternating carbon–carbon triple and double bonds, i.e., hexa-3-en-1,5-diyne (enediyne) unit. Conjugated chromophores containing this unit possess unusual optical and electrochemical properties, as was demonstrated by Diederich and others. , The Diederich group also reported a conjugated porphyrin dimer, connected by an enediyne unit . Moreover, conjugated enediynes undergo trans–cis photoisomerization, a trait that has been utilized for the development of photochromic and redox-active molecules. Overall, we have anticipated that the combination of enediynes with hydroporphyrins will lead to molecules with interesting and useful optical and photochemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Apparently, the spacing induced by the four acetylenic C-atoms between the CC bonds is enough to reduce the steric interactions between the peripheral cyclohexylidene moieties, thereby allowing a more-planar p-chromophore. Furthermore, it has been previously shown [18] that effective p-electron conjugation between directly connected CC and CC bonds does not require full planarity of the C 4 fragment in view of the cylindrical p-electron conjugation in the acetylenic bond. Both factors should enhance cross-conjugation in the expanded dendralenes as compared to the parent compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%